incubator-empire-db-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Francis De Brabandere <franci...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ready for release?
Date Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:36:14 GMT
> But before this goes on forever we should really set a deadline for completing the process.
> So I suggest Sunday in a week (28.6.) midnight as the deadline for all changes and improvements
of the pending release, so that we can start voting on the release from Monday 29th.
> Should we encounter any severe problems we can still extend the deadline.

sounds like a good idea

>
> Rainer
>
>
> Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> Re: ready for release?
>>
>> I used the jetty plugin to test the web apps (mvn jetty:run), I have
>> never used WTP (and its m2e integration) before, maybe you should have
>> a look at some other web projects that use maven. I know wicket has a
>> Start.java that starts an embedded jetty.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Rainer Döbele<doebele@esteam.de>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > I found a litte problem:
>> > For some reason the WTP-Eclipse plugin was commented out on the two
>> struts2 web example projects (empire-db-example-struts2 + empire-db-
>> example-struts2-cxf).
>> > I have commented them in and run mvn eclipse:eclipse.
>> > For some reason the litte earth symbol that is usually on the top
>> left of the project icon for WTP Projects is not there, but I could
>> choose "debug on server".
>> > Then I found, that I got a "Class not found" error.
>> > So I checked the Java EE Module dependencies and found that the
>> dependencies were not selected.
>> > I selected them but still got the error because for some reason it
>> does not see to load the empire-db-struts2 classes.
>> >
>> > My questions:
>> > 1. Has anyone managed to run the two web samples projects?
>> > 2. What do we need to change that the run off the shelf?
>> > 3. Does anyone know whether there is a Maven plugin that's sets up
>> the project for the use with the tomcat sysdeo Eclipse plugin?
>> >
>> > @Francis: About the wiki:
>> > At the moment we have a rather static website.
>> > I don't know whether or how to set up a wiki.
>> > Sorry.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> >> Re: ready for release?
>> >>
>> >> Ok that building.txt is kind of like our readme
>> >> we also need some release task list and I need to look into
>> releasing
>> >> using meven on the apache infrastructure. I know they have a staging
>> >> repository but I'm not sure incubator projects can use it.
>> >>
>> >> Would it be hard to have a wiki set up for our project? Or is that
>> >> planned for after incubation?
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Francis De
>> >> Brabandere<francisdb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Concerning the release there might be a difference for incubator
>> >> > projects but I'll have a look at it tomorrow.
>> >> >
>> >> > As for the logging I don't care that the build logs a lot but it's
>> >> not
>> >> > that I'm against hiding the logging either
>> >> >
>> >> > Francis
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Rainer Döbele<doebele@esteam.de>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> Hi Francis,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> well I did it myself on my machine and I was just thinking about
>> it.
>> >> >> My personal opinion is, that I don't need log output from tests
>> for
>> >> every build - all I need to know is whether any of the tests failed
>> at
>> >> all. If so, I can investigate on this specific test.
>> >> >> But it's a personal opinion.
>> >> >> Write the log output to a file sounds like a good idea to me too.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The next question is: Do we now put it up for voting or not.
>> >> >> Is there anything else we can or must supply.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Apache CXF has a nice document called "BUILDING.txt" that
>> explains
>> >> how to build with Maven.
>> >> >> We could adapt this for our release.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> @Jörg are you still reading this. What's your opinion?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards
>> >> >> Rainer
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> >> >>> Re: logging of unit tests
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> So I set the level to FATAL and put those parse warnings back
to
>> >> error
>> >> >>> then? Should I convert the log4j settings to xml format?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> But if you are not interested in them maybe we can just log
to a
>> >> file
>> >> >>> in the target folder instead of console?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Rainer
>> Döbele<doebele@esteam.de>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> > Hi Francis,
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > thanks a lot.
>> >> >>> > Now I can see where the properties for log4j are set.
>> >> >>> > I didn't think about looking in src/test/resources - but
its
>> >> logical.
>> >> >>> > Usually we use an embedded xml configuration instead of
a
>> >> properties
>> >> >>> file.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > The output is much better, however I would even consider
>> setting
>> >> the
>> >> >>> debug level to FATAL instead of WARN.
>> >> >>> > The overall result is measured anyway and there is IMO
not
>> much
>> >> >>> benefit in having the log output there.
>> >> >>> > What do you think?
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Regards
>> >> >>> > Rainer
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> >> >>> >> Re: revive the release process
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> Changed those errors to warnings for logging since
a default
>> >> value
>> >> >>> is
>> >> >>> >> provided these are no real exceptions.
>> >> >>> >> Also set the unit test default log level to WARN
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> Let me know if this is ok, we could also keep them
at error
>> >> level
>> >> >>> and
>> >> >>> >> not provide the stack trace. I don't know of an option
in
>> log4j
>> >> to
>> >> >>> >> hide the traces
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> What do you think?
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Francis De
>> >> >>> >> Brabandere<francisdb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > Hi Rainer,
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > I'll have a look at the logging this evening.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Rainer
>> >> Döbele<doebele@esteam.de>
>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >> Hi Francis (and everyone interested),
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> after it has been very quiet on the dev-mailing
list
>> >> recently, I
>> >> >>> >> would like to revive the release process of empire-db
2.0.5
>> in
>> >> order
>> >> >>> to
>> >> >>> >> be able to go ahead with some possibly bigger changes.
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> The current assembly builds well and I as
far as I can
>> tell
>> >> all
>> >> >>> >> required legal documents are there.
>> >> >>> >> >> However, there is one thing that annoys me:
>> >> >>> >> >> The JUnit test-code produces very verbose
output -
>> including
>> >> some
>> >> >>> >> exceptions.
>> >> >>> >> >> Those exceptions are intended and handled
properly - but
>> are
>> >> >>> >> confusing.
>> >> >>> >> >> @Francis: is there a way of disabling log
output when
>> running
>> >> the
>> >> >>> >> unit tests?
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> Apart from that the assembly is fine to me.
>> >> >>> >> >> Anyone else to comment the assembly before
we put it up
>> for
>> >> >>> voting?
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> Regards
>> >> >>> >> >> Rainer
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > --
>> >> >>> >> > http://www.somatik.be
>> >> >>> >> > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you
the whole
>> house.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> --
>> >> >>> >> http://www.somatik.be
>> >> >>> >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole
house.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> --
>> >> >>> http://www.somatik.be
>> >> >>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > http://www.somatik.be
>> >> > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> http://www.somatik.be
>> >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.somatik.be
>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>



-- 
http://www.somatik.be
Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.

Mime
View raw message