Mailing-List: contact empire-db-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: empire-db-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C924CA.8500939C"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:07:39 +0200
Message-ID: <0864536CC6E70F4F9FF85DE7334908CC23652F@esteams1.esteam.local>
Thread-Topic: [VOTE] apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release
Thread-Index: AckjQ4nSsHWoYK8ISO+ZSKwM42m8FwBhj6PJ
References: <0864536CC6E70F4F9FF85DE7334908CC07C130@esteams1.esteam.local>
 <0864536CC6E70F4F9FF85DE7334908CC23425C@esteams1.esteam.local>
 <0864536CC6E70F4F9FF85DE7334908CC2342A4@esteams1.esteam.local>
 <20080930205734.D40709@minotaur.apache.org>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rainer_D=F6bele?= <doebele@esteam.de>
To: <empire-db-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Cc: <fischer@seitenbau.net>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C924CA.8500939C
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Thomas,
=20
thanks for your vote on the Empire-db PMC.
=20
It would be great if you could give us your vote on the Inubator PMC =
too, before you head off for holiday.
We need your vote there even more.
J=F6rg has already called for voting.
=20
Thanks in advance.
=20
Rainer
=20
=20
Thomas Fischer wrote:
>=20
>=20
> I checked the following
>=20
> - files unpack correctly
> - there is a bit of documentation (this could be improved in the =
future,
> e.g the user has to guess to use ant)
> - the licenses if the distributed libs are ok
> - LICENSE.txt file is included and contents are ok
> - NOTICE.txt file is included and contents are ok (though the apache
> sections should be moved to top in the next release)
> - copyright notices in source files are ok
> - disclaimer is ok
> - status page exists but is not up to date. I am afraid that I =
currently
> do not have the time to update that.
> - the source builds
> - the source code is not tagged.
> - the KEYS file exists
> - the md5, sha1 and asc files are correct. The format of the md5 sum =
files
> has improved, though automatic checking with --check still does not =
work.
> Butt I did not look into this in detail.
>   - there are no more duplicate jars in the example
>=20
> So my Vote is +1, provided that a svn tag will be set to the revision
> where the source was built from
>=20
> As Henning has already checked the empire-db distribution, I am =
content
> with that also.
>=20
> Good work !
>=20
>     Thomas
>=20
> P.S. I will be on vacation and offline starting rom October 4th to =
October
> 15th.


------_=_NextPart_001_01C924CA.8500939C--