incubator-easyant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Louis Boudart <jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re : State of EasyAnt (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Jan 2012 ([ppmc]))
Date Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:51:34 GMT
Changes in the code itself should be commited at the end of the week. And i
will probably write a blog entry about this.
Then to finalize the release the documentation needs to be updated and i
don't know yet how many time will be required to update it.

2012/1/17 sbert.rousseau.ML@gmail.com <sbert.rousseau.ml@gmail.com>

> It's a very good news.
>
> Have you got a date for the change between phase and extension point.
>
> I think it is very important for users to have news on the site and a new
> release.
>
> Sbert.
>
> Envoyé depuis mon HTC
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> De : "Jean-Louis Boudart" <jeanlouis.boudart@gmail.com>
> Pour : <easyant-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> Objet : State of EasyAnt (was Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Jan 2012
> ([ppmc]))
> Date : lun., janv. 16, 2012 11:18
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the delay i've not been available as  much as expected those last
> months.
> I'll be more available at the end of the week i think and i plan to finish
> and commit the refactoring of phases.
>
> As you pointed out we're in Apache Incubator since one year and we still
> have not achieved our objectives.
> I assume the main problem comes from our huge refactoring due to one of the
> core developper who didn't sign the CLA. As a consequence we've removed lot
> of features which were part of easyant (plugin documentation, some plugins,
> etc..). It probably affects a bit the motivation of others, at least it is
> my case, reimplementing stuff is not so fun (removing it either cc Nicolas
> :p).
>
> I still believe Apache is the place to be for EasyAnt i still plan to make
> this project live and to create interaction with Ant and Ivy community.
>
> To release the next version we need to finish our refactoring on phases and
> update documentation (including plugins). Then i propose for a n+1release
> (probably the 1.0) to provide a way to  test plugins and to generate
> documentation for plugins.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Le 9 janvier 2012 14:39, Nicolas Lalevée <nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org> a
> écrit :
>
> >
> > Le 6 janv. 2012 à 07:35, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
> >
> > > Agreed, this needs to be done, but do we have any timeframe by which
> > > this will be done or by which we call incubation failed?  To some
> degree
> > > I'm playing devil's advocate here, but eternal incubation is not an
> > > option.
> >
> > I am starting to think it quite loud so I'll write it. If there is no
> much
> > progress until the next report, 3 month from now, I'm thinking that we
> > shouldn't bother Apache any longer. It would make a little more than one
> > year of incubation. "One year" is a period mentioned on the
> > incubator-general when there was a discussion about how long a podling
> > should last. It was just a discussion there, not official, podling can
> last
> > longer, but I think this is a good period length for podling to ask
> > themself if they are not wasting ASF resources.
> > And guys, it absolutely doesn't mean EasyAnt would be dead, it will just
> > mean it is not enough active to demonstrate proper integration into the
> > ASF. It can properly live back on easyant.org.
> >
> > Nicolas
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jean Louis Boudart
> Independent consultant
> Apache EasyAnt commiter http://incubator.apache.org/easyant/
>



-- 
Jean Louis Boudart
Independent consultant
Apache EasyAnt commiter http://incubator.apache.org/easyant/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message