incubator-easyant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicolas Lalevée <nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org>
Subject Re: Refactoring phases in favor of extention points
Date Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:36:04 GMT

Le 15 déc. 2011 à 11:39, Jean-Louis Boudart a écrit :

> Dear EasyAnters,
> 
> As you should know we are doing a huge refactoring on EasyAnt including
> migration from phases to extention points [1].
> I was wondering if next release should be compatible with both phases and
> extention points.
> 
> IMHO we should focus on extention points and forget phases, and i suggest
> to mark all previous plugins incompatible with the next release.
> 
> As part of the next release, we also plan to use alternative ProjectHelper,
> in other words to support plugins written in java (using Ant JavaFront) or
> groovy (using Ant GroovyFront). This could be achieved without effort with
> "extention point" as the feature is native to Ant whereas "phase" is (or
> was :p) specific to EasyAnt. Adding support of phases on alternative
> ProjectHelper would create unnecessary work.
> 
> I know it's always better to keep backward compatibility, but the way of
> thinking plugins with phases is really different from plugins with
> extentionPoint. I think it's not safe to maintain plugins with both
> features. As we're migrating to Apache,  it's probably the right moment to
> make this kind of change.

+1

Nicolas


Mime
View raw message