incubator-easyant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Louis Boudart <>
Subject Re: Website
Date Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:33:42 GMT
Looks good for me. I also think it would be great to have a staging website.

The process seems workable enough and can be handled by an easyant build
(playing with scm-svn, xooki plugin).
We can imagine having something like this  :

   - easyant publish-local : would generate local website
   - easyant publish-shared : would generate the staging website and publish
   - easyant release : would generate the production website

I created an issue for this ( and attached a draft there

Le 28 février 2011 11:34, Nicolas Lalevée <> a
écrit :

> Hi guys,
> (most of this email is quite a duplicate of the one I have done on ant-dev)
> Finally I looked myself into how the Apache CMS works.
> So basically it is about having somewhere in svn the sources of the website
> in markdown format. A buildbot job then takes care of building the html
> files and commit them into a "staging" branch. The staging branch is
> published via svnpubsub to Then we can trigger a merge
> of the staging branch into a production one. Another buildbot build the html
> file and again a svnpubsub push it to
> For thoses who don't know, svnpubsub is a tool developed by the ASF infra
> in order to have svn changed quite quickly and efficiently retrieved. The
> ASF infra is promoting it for website publishing.
> For our needs, I think it would be great to have both a staging and a
> production branches, so there would also be a
> About having a buildbot to build the website, I don't think it is possible
> with xooki, as the current build around xooki is not able to make the
> distinction between a change in the template and a change in a source. So
> the build doesn't know wether to build the changed files or the entire
> website. As the xooki generation is quite slow, if there is a lot of page
> like in the Ivy site, it can takes ages.
> But I think this is still workable with xooki. So what I suggest is having
> the following svn layout:
> * incubator/easyant/site/sources
> * incubator/easyant/site/staging
> * incubator/easyant/site/production
> And the process will be:
> * edit the xooki files in "sources"
> * locally launch a build so that "staging" get populated (and we are the
> smart ones which will either launch a build for an update or a launch for a
> complete rebuild)
> * commit the generated files in "staging"
> * "staging" get automatically deployed on
> via svnpubsub
> * promoting to live will be about svn merging the "staging" into the
> "production" branch
> * the merge commit in "production" will be automatically be deployed on
> via svnpubsub
> WDYT ?
> Nicolas

Jean Louis Boudart
Independent consultant
Project Lead

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message