>
>
> Every ASF committer that has demonstrated his/her commitment to droids
> through the normal meritocracy policy we have on the ASF will be voted
> in from all active PMC members.
>
> New droids developer (non-ASF committers) are need to demonstrate
> his/her commitment through the normal meritocracy policy we have on
> the
> ASF. If they get voted in as committer their should as well become
> part
> of the PMC since if they are committed to the project they should have
> as well a binding vote."
>
> WDYT?
I suggest we let any ASF committer who *wants* to be a committer on
droids be a committer. Unless there are tons of requests to
root@apache, I'm not sure I see the value it having global write access.
As for the PMC, I'm fine with every committer being on the PMC (though
- of course - it does not make sense if all ASF committers are on the
PMC). But I think this will depend more on if it becomes a TLP or sub
project. In practice I don't see it really making a difference, as
Grant noted, every vote I have seen (in solr) does not treat PMC/
committers/public any different -- a -1 is usually a -1 for good reason.
In my opinion, the only need for a semi-private group dedicated to
droids is to discuss and decide what non-committers should become
committers.
I think we can use the droids committer status as a way to signify
commitment/involvement in a project rather then a way to exclude
contribution. I think we can have an inclusive committer policy
without tossing the general model.
ryan
|