incubator-drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ben Flint <bfl...@popcap.com>
Subject Re: Parser
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:15:21 GMT
+1 for maven.  Gradle wouldn't be bad either if it's flexibility we're
after.

On 9/12/12 1:53 PM, "Vladimir Klimontovich" <klimontovich@gmail.com> wrote:

>I guess ant is good too if it's used together with ivy.
>
>
>On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Camuel Gilyadov <camuel@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> What is wrong with good old Ant?
>> I can live with maven too...   it just has too many gotchas
>>
>> On 9/12/12, Julien Le Dem <julien@twitter.com> wrote:
>>> +1 for maven.
>>> Could those against please suggest alternatives?
>>> Thank you
>>> Julien
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Camuel Gilyadov <camuel@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> -1 for maven.
>>>>
>>>> On 9/12/12, Constantine Peresypkin <pconstantine@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > If build system is evil it's better to build it manually.
>>>> > -1 for maven
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Michael Hausenblas <
>>>> > michael.hausenblas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about
the
>>>> >> > build
>>>> >> system for drill?
>>>> >> > I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO).
>>>> >> > I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> If codebase mainly in Java, yeah maven (though it feels like it
>>>> downloads
>>>> >> half of the Internet every time).
>>>> >>
>>>> >> But not so fast - did we agree on Java, yet? How about Scala + SBT
>>>> >> [1]?
>>>> >> Integrates nicely with Java and is soooo much more productive ;)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Cheers,
>>>> >>            Michael
>>>> >>
>>>> >> [1] http://www.scala-sbt.org/
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Michael Hausenblas
>>>> >> Ireland, Europe
>>>> >> http://mhausenblas.info/
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On 12 Sep 2012, at 20:47, David Alves wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about
the
>>>> >> > build
>>>> >> system for drill?
>>>> >> > I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO).
>>>> >> > I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > -david
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >> I see classes in the source tree:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> 
>>>>https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser/tree/master/src/org/apache/drill/
>>>>parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen/classes/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/dr
>>>>qlantlr/autogen
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Also, I would strongly recommend pulling the antlr source
code
>>>>into
>>>> an
>>>> >> >> antler source tree.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Camuel Gilyadov
>>>> >> >> <camuel@bigdatacraft.com>wrote:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>> Still work in progress, but anyway -
>>>> >> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> Constructive critique and contributions are welcome
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from my mobile device
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my mobile device
>
>
>
>-- 
>Vladimir Klimontovich
>Cell: +7-926-890-2349, skype: klimontovich
>


Mime
View raw message