incubator-drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Arun Yadav <arunw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Parser
Date Thu, 13 Sep 2012 07:36:38 GMT
+1 for maven however, would welcome better option if any.
On Sep 13, 2012 2:45 AM, "Ben Flint" <bflint@popcap.com> wrote:

> +1 for maven.  Gradle wouldn't be bad either if it's flexibility we're
> after.
>
> On 9/12/12 1:53 PM, "Vladimir Klimontovich" <klimontovich@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >I guess ant is good too if it's used together with ivy.
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Camuel Gilyadov <camuel@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >> What is wrong with good old Ant?
> >> I can live with maven too...   it just has too many gotchas
> >>
> >> On 9/12/12, Julien Le Dem <julien@twitter.com> wrote:
> >>> +1 for maven.
> >>> Could those against please suggest alternatives?
> >>> Thank you
> >>> Julien
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Camuel Gilyadov <camuel@gmail.com>
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> -1 for maven.
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/12/12, Constantine Peresypkin <pconstantine@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> > If build system is evil it's better to build it manually.
> >>>> > -1 for maven
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Michael Hausenblas <
> >>>> > michael.hausenblas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what
about the
> >>>> >> > build
> >>>> >> system for drill?
> >>>> >> > I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java
IMO).
> >>>> >> > I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> If codebase mainly in Java, yeah maven (though it feels like
it
> >>>> downloads
> >>>> >> half of the Internet every time).
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> But not so fast - did we agree on Java, yet? How about Scala
+ SBT
> >>>> >> [1]?
> >>>> >> Integrates nicely with Java and is soooo much more productive
;)
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Cheers,
> >>>> >>            Michael
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> [1] http://www.scala-sbt.org/
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> --
> >>>> >> Michael Hausenblas
> >>>> >> Ireland, Europe
> >>>> >> http://mhausenblas.info/
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On 12 Sep 2012, at 20:47, David Alves wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what
about the
> >>>> >> > build
> >>>> >> system for drill?
> >>>> >> > I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java
IMO).
> >>>> >> > I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed.
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > -david
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> >> I see classes in the source tree:
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser/tree/master/src/org/apache/drill/
> >>>>parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen/classes/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/dr
> >>>>qlantlr/autogen
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >> Also, I would strongly recommend pulling the antlr
source code
> >>>>into
> >>>> an
> >>>> >> >> antler source tree.
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Camuel Gilyadov
> >>>> >> >> <camuel@bigdatacraft.com>wrote:
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >>> Still work in progress, but anyway -
> >>>> >> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser
> >>>> >> >>>
> >>>> >> >>> Constructive critique and contributions are welcome
> >>>> >> >>>
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sent from my mobile device
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from my mobile device
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Vladimir Klimontovich
> >Cell: +7-926-890-2349, skype: klimontovich
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message