incubator-directmemory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Williams <william...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release?
Date Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:36:22 GMT
That's great news Olivier!

--tim

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> If no other volunteer, I will work on releasing a 0.1 early next week.
> IHMO this can be considered as a released "technology preview" (even
> if apis change later).
>
> 2012/6/15 Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com>:
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Jeff MAURY <jeffmaury@jeffmaury.com> wrote:
>>> I think there are a number of items to work before we do a release.
>>> I'm not very familiar of Apache way of release but I have the feeling that
>>
>> releasing is not only putting software "to the public", it is also
>> "learning how to release" (at least in the incubator). Nobody expects
>> a perfect release with a 1.0 imho. "Release often, early".
>>
>>> if we do a release now, we will break compatibility with next release.
>>> Why not an Alpha of Beta or continue on a 0.0.x ?
>>
>> Nothing speaks against that :-)
>> 0.0.1 sounds pretty alpha to me, i would skip the term "alpha" and
>> just make "0.0.1". One can state on the homepage that the API is
>> matter of change.
>>
>> I have only limited time, but I am willing to look at your artifacts
>> and help pointing you to the right docs with the release. In addition
>> I think one of the new arrived people should release. As mentioned, it
>> is learning, and if always the old grumpys release, the new blood does
>> not gain experience. :-)
>>
>> Cheers
>> Christian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi <
>>> raffaele.p.guidi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am in shortage of spare time since a while and it will be even worse for
>>>> the next few months. And also I've never managed an Apache release. I think
>>>> that this is going to take a bit longer than expected.
>>>>
>>>> Ciao,
>>>>    R
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Tommaso Teofili
>>>> <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Big +1 for a release, personally I'm busy with (trying to) release Amber
>>>> at
>>>> > the moment, if anyone can jump in it'd be perfect otherwise I'll try
to
>>>> do
>>>> > it once Amber gets a release.
>>>> > Tommaso
>>>> >
>>>> > 2012/6/15 Simone Tripodi <simonetripodi@apache.org>
>>>> >
>>>> > > Hi Tim!!!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > agreed, a release is "needed", we've been around for a long time
-
>>>> > > time for people to know more from us! :P
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I'll contribute on double check the RC, unfortunately I've been
too
>>>> > > much busy in the last months (and still am) so cannot contribute
as
>>>> > > RM.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > All the best,
>>>> > > -Simo
>>>> > >
>>>> > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> > > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>>> > > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>>> > > http://www.99soft.org/
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > > > Gents,
>>>> > > > Can you work out a release soon? You develop and interact
according
>>>> to
>>>> > > > the apache way and yet you're still in incubation because
you've not
>>>> > > > had a formal release.  I'm wondering if one of the old timers
around
>>>> > > > here can be the RM and just get it done so that we can graduate
>>>> > > > already? Call it 0.1 if needbe:)
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Thanks,
>>>> > > > --tim
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jeff MAURY
>>>
>>>
>>> "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually
>>> working and scaling.
>>>  - Bjarne Stroustrup
>>>
>>> http://www.jeffmaury.com
>>> http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
>>> http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

Mime
View raw message