incubator-directmemory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael André Pearce <michael.andre.pea...@me.com>
Subject Re: DIRECTMEMORY-9
Date Fri, 02 Mar 2012 07:22:52 GMT
I think you may want some defragmentation still, especially if the buffers a fair % full and
the free pointers are spread, would mean that if any larger object that the free pointers
arent large enough for, but in total could hold, without defrag would mean wouldn't be able
to store.


On 2 Mar 2012, at 07:15, Benoit Perroud wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> Now with DIRECTMEMORY-40 done and a new slab's style allocator, I
> wonder if DIRECTMEMORY-9 is still relevant or if it could also be
> closed.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benoit.


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message