incubator-directmemory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Raffaele P. Guidi" <raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Performance testing infrastructure [was: Re: Release? [was: Re: Status of DirectMemory]
Date Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:11:06 GMT
Sure, I used an extra large instance with 16gb of ram in the past - it
costed about 1 dollar per hour
Il giorno 25/gen/2012 12:02, "Tim Williams" <williamstw@gmail.com> ha
scritto:

> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Raffaele P. Guidi
> <raffaele.p.guidi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Benchmarking with 4, 8 and 16 gb would be a good start. Existing tests
> > could be used as a starting point but I think they will need changes and
> > tuning - and I have personal problems at the moment that prevent me from
> > being able to work on this.
>
> I started a conversation over on infrastructure@.  The short version
> is that we have no 'standard' way to support this right now but
> they're willing to discuss it.  One option is to use EC2, but they
> need more information on what's needed in terms of detailed ideas of
> CPU cores, CPU time, disk space, disk i/O usage etc.  Obviously, they
> can't just let us loose on EC2 without knowing what the bill would
> look like in the end.  Can someone either give an idea of those
> details (?maybe in terms of the EC2 instance types? and amount of time
> needed)?  Or, you could join the conversation on infrastructure@...
>
> Thanks,
> --tim
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message