Mailing-List: contact directmemory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: directmemory-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of raffaele.p.guidi@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANrzj0kssgBmWu3tG7sDiyzTi0n3QxUwbQyxxkVFEUV03r1o4Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGnSx06Zy3Q5mYy4uf-05yykke6J8wBWky64-A3BX740PtFOPA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAnVOG3yRSEfsk_8HS2kCJ=CNS0kaJ3N28TTmQZnxrgLsJEzuA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANrzj0kssgBmWu3tG7sDiyzTi0n3QxUwbQyxxkVFEUV03r1o4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:08:48 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAAnVOG0AZ0pFs2KA9o4RT01zH1ou+xvm8gUyzQonO8dpdos0Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cache keys
From: "Raffaele P. Guidi" <raffaele.p.guidi@gmail.com>
To: directmemory-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174755caa24ded04b53fd8a7

--0015174755caa24ded04b53fd8a7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Great! Right, keys are managed by the guava map that don't require
Serializable
Il giorno 29/dic/2011 20:01, "Maurizio Cucchiara" <mcucchiara@apache.org>
ha scritto:

> AFAICU there is no reason to implement the Serializable IF, since keys
> are not serialized (I could be wrong though)
> The switch from string to object looks apparently simple, I haven't
> experienced any issues until now (every test run smoothly) .
> I'm going to attach a patch on DIRECTMEMORY-43 [1], please let me know
> WDYT.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRECTMEMORY-43
>
>
> Twitter     :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
> G+          :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
> Linkedin    :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
>
> Maurizio Cucchiara
>
>
>
> On 15 December 2011 15:28, Raffaele P. Guidi <raffaele.p.guidi@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Sure it would be a good thing, of course keeping the most frequent use
> case
> > as simple as possibile. Also remember that one of the things that allows
> > DirectMemory to perform well is protostuff - that is an efficient and
> > unobtrusive way to work around serialization.
> >
> > Ciao,
> >   R
> > Il giorno 15/dic/2011 13:56, "Tommaso Teofili" <
> tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>
> > ha scritto:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> while working on one of the examples I found myself wondering why keys
> in
> >> Cache have to be Strings.
> >> Generally a cache should also be able to use objects of whatever nature
> as
> >> keys, so we could use the same serialization mechanism used for values
> or,
> >> at least, define keys to be implementing the java.io.Serializable
> >> interface.
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >> Tommaso
> >>
>

--0015174755caa24ded04b53fd8a7--