incubator-directmemory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Raffaele P. Guidi" <raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Integration vs Unit tests
Date Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:12:13 GMT
A good idea. I used to have a completely separate project for benchmarks,
with an older implementation. I to think these should run nightly instead
than continuously and should fail if performance degrades - but at the time
I didn't have a CI server.

+1
Il giorno 30/dic/2011 22:58, "Maurizio Cucchiara" <mcucchiara@apache.org>
ha scritto:

> Personally I like very much junit-benchmark  (thanks to Raffaele who
> let me know about it), I also understand that accessing to memory
> might produce concurrency issues, but I think that integration tests
> provide many benefits that unit tests do not (and vice versa).
> Moreover, benchmarks are much more expansive in terms of
> time/resources consume.
> Slow tests give a slow feedback and in the long run might discourage
> developers from running tests.
> So I'd love to keep them separate and maybe introduce a maven
> profile/var to skip benchmarks.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Twitter     :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
> G+          :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
> Linkedin    :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
>
> Maurizio Cucchiarae
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message