incubator-directmemory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Raffaele P. Guidi" <raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Cache keys
Date Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:08:48 GMT
Great! Right, keys are managed by the guava map that don't require
Serializable
Il giorno 29/dic/2011 20:01, "Maurizio Cucchiara" <mcucchiara@apache.org>
ha scritto:

> AFAICU there is no reason to implement the Serializable IF, since keys
> are not serialized (I could be wrong though)
> The switch from string to object looks apparently simple, I haven't
> experienced any issues until now (every test run smoothly) .
> I'm going to attach a patch on DIRECTMEMORY-43 [1], please let me know
> WDYT.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRECTMEMORY-43
>
>
> Twitter     :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
> G+          :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
> Linkedin    :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
>
> Maurizio Cucchiara
>
>
>
> On 15 December 2011 15:28, Raffaele P. Guidi <raffaele.p.guidi@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Sure it would be a good thing, of course keeping the most frequent use
> case
> > as simple as possibile. Also remember that one of the things that allows
> > DirectMemory to perform well is protostuff - that is an efficient and
> > unobtrusive way to work around serialization.
> >
> > Ciao,
> >   R
> > Il giorno 15/dic/2011 13:56, "Tommaso Teofili" <
> tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>
> > ha scritto:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> while working on one of the examples I found myself wondering why keys
> in
> >> Cache have to be Strings.
> >> Generally a cache should also be able to use objects of whatever nature
> as
> >> keys, so we could use the same serialization mechanism used for values
> or,
> >> at least, define keys to be implementing the java.io.Serializable
> >> interface.
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >> Tommaso
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message