incubator-directmemory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benoit Perroud (Created) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (DIRECTMEMORY-41) Unified usage of Pointer.expires and Pointer.expiresIn
Date Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:09:30 GMT
Unified usage of Pointer.expires and Pointer.expiresIn
------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: DIRECTMEMORY-41
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRECTMEMORY-41
             Project: Apache DirectMemory
          Issue Type: Improvement
            Reporter: Benoit Perroud
            Priority: Minor


Pointer.expires and Pointer.expiresIn variables have the same goal. It could be trivial to
unify them and then keep on of the version : either the absolute expiration is kept and expiresIn
is stored as currentTimeMillis + expiresIn, or relative expiration is kept and expires is
stored as expires - currentTimeMillis.

retrive function should also be aware of the expiration and have appropriate behavior when
a pointer's value has expired (throw an exception or return null ?)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message