incubator-directmemory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mir Tanvir Hossain <mir.tanvir.hoss...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Distributed DirectMemory
Date Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:49:38 GMT
I think it would be a great idea to merge these project to create a
complete caching solution. JCS seems to have an excellent disk caching
support as well. So, the combined project could be a fantastic caching
solution.

-Mir

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi <
raffaele.p.guidi@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is of course an interesting option - well, we could also leverage
> indexed disk cache as L3 - and steal indexing and recycling techniques.
> Merging efforts with JCS could bring to the most complete java cache
> solution in the OS world. I don't have any idea about performance of JCS
> and its lateral cache, but it's probably a bit outdated and could benefit
> from a technology refresh (NIO, fast serialization - see Apache Avro as an
> example)
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Mir Tanvir Hossain <
> mir.tanvir.hossain@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > JCS already has distributed caching option. So, instead of
> re-implementing
> > the distributed cache, we can integrate tightly with JCS, and become its
> > off-heap plugin. So, JCS could be the L1 cache, and DirectMemory could be
> > the L2 cache. Just an idea.
> >
> > -Mir
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Ioannis Canellos <iocanel@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I was looking at the jira issues and DIRECTMEMORY-13 - Make some
> > > investigation about going
> > > distributed<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRECTMEMORY-13>
> > > caught
> > > my attention.
> > >
> > > I've read about some of the initial thoughts about reusing features of
> > > existing Caches (Hazelcast or Terracotta) but I don't like this idea so
> > > much.
> > > We could reuse some of the ides that existing projects use, but I think
> > > that we should either build it on our own, or use a solution not
> coupled
> > to
> > > an existing cache.
> > >
> > > So what are your thought about making direct memory distributed?
> > > Any thoughts about the consistency model, discovery etc?
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Ioannis Canellos*
> > > *
> > > FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
> > >
> > > **
> > > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> > > **
> > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> > > Apache Camel <http://camel.apache.org/> Committer
> > > Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/>  Committer
> > > Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer
> > > Apache DirectMemory <http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/>
> > Committer
> > > *
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message