From depot-dev-return-361-apmail-incubator-depot-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Sat May 01 06:36:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-depot-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48531 invoked from network); 1 May 2004 06:36:40 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 May 2004 06:36:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 98937 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2004 06:36:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-depot-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98908 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2004 06:36:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact depot-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: "Depot Development" List-Id: Depot Development Delivered-To: mailing list depot-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98892 invoked from network); 1 May 2004 06:36:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 May 2004 06:36:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 8359 invoked by uid 0); 1 May 2004 06:36:22 -0000 Received: from 217.226.172.122 by www18.gmx.net with HTTP; Sat, 1 May 2004 08:36:22 +0200 (MEST) Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 08:36:22 +0200 (MEST) From: "Markus M. May" To: "Depot Development" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <085301c42ebd$53085c50$51efea43@sybase.com> Subject: Re: MD5 Hash X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated: #450643 Message-ID: <22584.1083393382@www18.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --- snip --- > I am getting (finally) closer to being able hack this code agian. My > thinking is we associate MD5 checksum files URLs with files URLs (as > attributes), and when we decide to download one we (1) copy to an unsafe > place (2) check the checksum against that one (3) move if ok (4) fail > [exception] if not. > > That said, my first priority is getting all the unit tests up and running, > and getting back into this code so I can do that easily. > > regards, > > Adam > --- snap --- Hello Adam, I think (4) should be something like: the user can decide (via a property or via an question, if the build fails or the build continues. R, markus