From depot-dev-return-195-apmail-incubator-depot-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Mar 17 14:25:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-depot-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41277 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2004 14:25:58 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2004 14:25:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 15560 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2004 14:25:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-depot-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 15539 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2004 14:25:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact depot-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: "Depot Development" List-Id: Depot Development Delivered-To: mailing list depot-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 15517 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2004 14:25:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fep03-svc.flexmail.it) (212.131.248.106) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2004 14:25:54 -0000 Received: from apache.org ([80.204.154.190]) by fep03-svc.flexmail.it with ESMTP id <20040317142554.JEZK16170.fep03-svc.flexmail.it@apache.org> for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:25:54 +0100 Message-ID: <40585FEF.9010005@apache.org> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:25:51 +0100 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Depot Development Subject: [VOTE] Naming stuff with fance names... not Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Fancy names are sometimes catchy, and help identify the project, unless there are too many of them. Usually a project should have only one fancy name, but we have two: 'depot' and 'ruper'. Hence, why not make a single logo for 'Depot', and simply name the artifacts "versioner" and "updater"? Hence it would be Depot versioner Depot updater (or Depot Version and Depot Update) I think this would improve the clarity for outsiders and make the site, docs, and code more understandable. In any case, we need to do it now, before a first milestone release. WDOT? From me, +1 (please specify if you prefer the -er ending) -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------