From depot-dev-return-219-apmail-incubator-depot-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Thu Mar 18 15:47:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-depot-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4914 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 15:47:01 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 15:47:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 31011 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2004 15:46:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-depot-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30982 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2004 15:46:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact depot-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: "Depot Development" List-Id: Depot Development Delivered-To: mailing list depot-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30968 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 15:46:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.try.sybase.com) (130.214.10.19) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 15:46:55 -0000 Received: from mail.try.sybase.com (mail.try.sybase.com [130.214.10.18]) by mx1.try.sybase.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i2IEiv206878 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:44:57 -0700 Received: from tsws1 ([10.22.120.82]) by mail.try.sybase.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i2IFSak10219 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:28:36 -0700 Message-ID: <01ef01c40d00$3ba3d410$cebfea43@tsws1> From: "Adam R. B. Jack" To: "Depot Development" References: <4059BF57.8040500@chalko.com> Subject: Re: Depot code prunning. Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:46:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yup, I like that idea. Version is huge, but I think (IMHO) because it tries to do a lot more than Ruper needs & much is needed. Still, let's find out. With Ruper it was a work in progress, and I think we over-fluffed it, too many classes. regards Adam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Chalko" To: "Depot Development" Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 8:25 AM Subject: Depot code prunning. > Version and Update are working product, the ant ruperset task > functions. However the code is bloated. > Way to many classes with way to many methods and constructors. > > It makes it really hard to figure out what to do. > I think we need to aggressively cut any method or class that is not > being used right now. > I propose we investigate clover or some other test coverage tools, and > use it to help us delete unused classes and methods. > > > > R, > Nick >