From depot-dev-return-97-apmail-incubator-depot-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Feb 17 16:00:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-depot-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20095 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2004 16:00:44 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2004 16:00:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 16995 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2004 16:00:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-depot-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 16969 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2004 16:00:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact depot-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: "Depot PPMC" List-Id: Depot PPMC Delivered-To: mailing list depot-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 16954 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2004 16:00:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO csm.chalko.com) (66.60.148.34) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2004 16:00:38 -0000 Received: from chalko.com (unknown [12.5.207.254]) by csm.chalko.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED35FF84 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:00:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <40323AA7.4070801@chalko.com> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:00:39 -0800 From: Nick Chalko User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Depot PPMC Subject: naming our jars was: [GUMP@lsd]: depot/depot-ruper failed References: <20040215055831.00F4C1B8428@mail22-ash.bigfish.com> <045901c3f3e8$7258f2a0$ecf3d33f@tsws1> In-Reply-To: <045901c3f3e8$7258f2a0$ecf3d33f@tsws1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Adam R. B. Jack wrote: >This gump build is failing 'cos the gump metadata thinks the ruper jar is >named differently ('cos I cut-n-paste it from the version one.) > >Let's try to be consistent between version and ruper. So: > >Do folks want: > > apache-depot-x > depot-x > x > > apache-x is another option. I vote to be consvative and avoid conflicts. apache-depot-x >I'm pretty ambivalence, but personally, I think the 'apache' on the jar is a >bit of a mouthful. I was dubious about depot being there, but can live with >that. I'll wait for other preferences before I pick one. > >regards, > >Adam > >