incubator-deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] DELTASPIKE-288
Date Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:26:20 GMT
hi thomas,

yes - i did it already in a local branch.
i planned to push it after a 2nd review of the new approach.
(we need the window-context from mark to finish the missing parts and i
would like to finish them before the 2nd review.)

regards,
gerhard



2013/2/14 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>

> Hi Gerhard,
>
> any news about this?
> Will the names be changed for the 0.4 release?
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
> 2012/11/13 Brian Leathem <bleathem@gmail.com>
>
> > +1 These name seem fine to me.
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >
> > On 12-11-11 06:56 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
> >
> >> hi @ all,
> >>
> >> it would be great to get feedback about the names (used in the api) we
> >> have
> >> right now.
> >> as mentioned by thomas, we could align some of them - e.g.:
> >>
> >> @View -> @ViewRef
> >> @Page -> @View
> >> @PageBean -> @ViewControllerBean
> >> @PrePageAction -> PreViewAction
> >> @PageParameter -> @NavigationParameter
> >> PageParameterContext -> NavigationParameterContext
> >>
> >> while discussing the names, i'll start to write the documentation for
> the
> >> api and spi which allows us to get a shared perception for the next step
> >> of
> >> the discussion.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> gerhard
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2012/11/2 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>  ok, great :)
> >>>
> >>> 2012/11/2 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>  hi thomas,
> >>>>
> >>>> that's one of the first topics i would like to discuss next week.
> >>>> (i just imported them with the same name to avoid confusion).
> >>>>
> >>>> we could rename @View e.g. to @ViewRef and @Page to @View (and
> >>>> @PageParameter e.g. to @ViewParameter)
> >>>> however, @ViewParameter might be a bit misleading.
> >>>>
> >>>> regards,
> >>>> gerhard
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2012/11/2 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>>  Hi Gerhard,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> just one question.
> >>>>> The "View" name is currently used for all the functions but NOT
for
> >>>>>
> >>>> @Page,
> >>>>
> >>>>> @PageBean or @PageParameter.
> >>>>> Wouldn't it be better to call them @View... too?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Thomas
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2012/11/2 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  hi @ all,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> i pushed a first draft for DELTASPIKE-288.
> >>>>>> i started with the original api provided by codi and improved
(+
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> prepared)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> some parts based on a short discussion with brian and mark.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> as soon as we have the final api and spi, i'll start with the
final
> >>>>>> integration with jsf.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> right now we have the first steps for:
> >>>>>>   - type-safe config and navigation (+ event)
> >>>>>>   - folder support
> >>>>>>   - new meta-model which allows to change the meta-data during
the
> >>>>>> bootstrapping process. (it's the basis for the final (fixed)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> meta-data
> >>>
> >>>> representation.)
> >>>>>>   - @Page and @Folder are optional (they get added dynamically
> during
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> the
> >>>>
> >>>>> bootstrapping process, if they aren't in place)
> >>>>>>   - no conceptual difference between meta-data provided by the
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> framework
> >>>
> >>>> and
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> custom meta-data
> >>>>>>   - no conceptual difference between callbacks provided by the
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> framework
> >>>
> >>>> and
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> custom callbacks
> >>>>>>   - view-config meta-data from codi (e.g.: @PageBean and
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> @PageParameter)
> >>>
> >>>>   - callbacks from codi (e.g.: @PreRenderView and @Secured)
> >>>>>>   - (optional) helpers from codi for manual/dynamic use-cases
(e.g.:
> >>>>>> ViewNavigationHandler and PageParameterContext)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> there are still a lot of todos and some parts which aren't
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> implemented.
> >>>
> >>>> since there are a lot of constellations we have to support, i'll
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> start
> >>>
> >>>> a
> >>>>
> >>>>> step-by-step discussion next week.
> >>>>>> you are welcome to look at the current api + spi as well as
the
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> use-cases +
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> tests i've pushed (to see the basic direction).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> regards,
> >>>>>> gerhard
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message