incubator-deltaspike-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
Subject Re: intermediate vcs
Date Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:07:31 GMT
oki, where would you add those BOMs?
Create an own project (similar to the bundles)?
Or add them as mixins?


LieGrue,
strub



----- Original Message -----
> From: Shane Bryzak <sbryzak@gmail.com>
> To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org; Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:20 PM
> Subject: Re: intermediate vcs
> 
>T hat's a good point, though another thing to consider is optional 3rd party
> dependencies.  For example, Seam JCR (which will possibly become DeltaSpike
> JCR eventually) can be used with either JackRabbit or ModeShape, or Seam
> Reports can be used with a number of different reporting engines.  Having
> the versions for these defined in the bom will make life much easier for
> the user.
> 
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:
> 
>>  Since we always release all of DeltaSpike in one go, the versions are
>>  always the same. This is really convenient to just add a property
>> 
>> 
>>  <properties>
>>      <deltaspike.version>0.1-SNAPSHOT</deltaspike.version>
>> 
>>  </properties>
>> 
>> 
>>  and use that for all your project.
>> 
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>>  >________________________________
>>  > From: Shane Bryzak <sbryzak@gmail.com>
>>  >To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org; Mark Struberg 
> <struberg@yahoo.de
>>  >
>>  >Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:10 PM
>>  >Subject: Re: intermediate vcs
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >At the bare minimum it can contain all of the DeltaSpike module 
> versions.
>>   Even if they're all the same, it still adds convenience.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Mark Struberg 
> <struberg@yahoo.de>
>>  wrote:
>>  >
>>  >yes, that sounds good. But is sometimes really heavily depending on the
>>  container you let this run in. So that part might become tricky.
>>  >>
>>  >>We should add it on our todo list for later evaluation.
>>  >>
>>  >>LieGrue,
>>  >>strub
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>>________________________________
>>  >>> From: Shane Bryzak <sbryzak@gmail.com>
>>  >>>To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org; Mark Struberg <
>>  struberg@yahoo.de>
>>  >>>Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:03 PM
>>  >>>Subject: Re: intermediate vcs
>>  >>
>>  >>>
>>  >>>
>>  >>>Looking pretty good.  Do you think we should add a BOM (Bill Of
>>  Materials) containing all of the dependencies and versions?  We find that
>>  it makes life much easier for our users if they can simply import the bom
>>  and not have to worry about dependency version hell.
>>  >>>
>>  >>>
>>  >>>On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Mark Struberg 
> <struberg@yahoo.de>
>>  wrote:
>>  >>>
>>  >>>I started with the initial project structure and some maven 
> stuff.
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>>I followed the intended structure from our Wiki.
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>>Please review.
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>>LieGrue,
>>  >>>>strub
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>>----- Original Message -----
>>  >>>>> From: Gerhard Petracek 
> <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
>>  >>>>> To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>  >>>>> Cc:
>>  >>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 10:52 AM
>>  >>>>> Subject: intermediate vcs
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>> hi @ all,
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>> since we have started several discussions, it makes 
> sense to
>>  prototype some
>>  >>>>> parts immediately.
>>  >>>>> mark and i suggest to start at [1] while the infra 
> team is preparing
>>  our
>>  >>>>> repository, ldap group,...
>>  >>>>> if you would like to join, send your user-name and you 
> will be added.
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>> regards,
>>  >>>>> gerhard
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>> [1] http://goo.gl/HmNBV
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>
>>  >>>
>>  >>>
>>  >>
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>> 
> 

Mime
View raw message