Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-deltacloud-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29765 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 15:44:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 15:44:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 9679 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 15:44:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-deltacloud-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9664 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 15:44:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact deltacloud-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: deltacloud-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list deltacloud-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9655 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 15:44:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:44:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mfojtik@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.132.183.28] (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:44:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9FFiNrl011947 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:44:23 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (vpn2-8-158.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.8.158]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9FFiK6J000868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:44:23 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:44:20 +0200 From: Michal Fojtik To: deltacloud-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Fixed xml_to_class method in client Message-ID: <20101015154419.GA16014@redhat.com> References: <1287145135-9090-1-git-send-email-mfojtik@redhat.com> <7885E2F4-A944-47E3-AFBB-EC800C4E7D52@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7885E2F4-A944-47E3-AFBB-EC800C4E7D52@redhat.com> X-Operating-System: Linux patashnik 2.6.34.7-56.fc13.i686.PAE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.12 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 15/10/10 08:31 -0400, Benjamin Browning wrote: > >On Oct 15, 2010, at 8:18 AM, mfojtik@redhat.com wrote: > >> Last important change is about versioning. Right now our version model is >> 0.0.9.x but now, version of client will need to be bumped to 0.0.9.9, so >> I changed version number to 0.0.1, which I hope will be easy to maintain >> and I will definitely looks better in RPMs. >> > >Should that not be 0.0.10 or 0.1.0? 0.0.1 < 0.0.9.x, which means most software and people will assume 0.0.1 is an older version. Yeah, you're absolutely right. I voting for 0.1.0 -- Michal -- -------------------------------------------------------- Michal Fojtik, mfojtik@redhat.com Deltacloud API: http://deltacloud.org --------------------------------------------------------