incubator-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject svn commit: r1433217 - /incubator/public/branches/license_howto/licensing_howto.mdtext
Date Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:39:17 GMT
Author: marvin
Date: Mon Jan 14 23:39:16 2013
New Revision: 1433217

Remove all mention of "binary" distributions.


Modified: incubator/public/branches/license_howto/licensing_howto.mdtext
--- incubator/public/branches/license_howto/licensing_howto.mdtext (original)
+++ incubator/public/branches/license_howto/licensing_howto.mdtext Mon Jan 14 23:39:16 2013
@@ -76,8 +76,6 @@ by the ASF Legal Affairs Committee.  Som
 `NOTICE` -- if in doubt,
-(TODO: Ensure that pointers suffice for binary distributions.)
 Bundling an Apache-2.0-licensed Dependency
@@ -121,20 +119,6 @@ to `LICENSE` and `NOTICE`.  As far as `L
 _only bundled bits matter._
-Binary Distributions with Additional Bundled Dependencies
-It is common for binary packages distributed alongside canonical source
-packages to bundle additional dependencies.  If that is the case, the
-`LICENSE` and `NOTICE` files for the compiled package and the source package
-must be treated separately.  Licensing information for dependencies which are
-bundled only with the binary distribution _must not_ be included in `LICENSE`
-and `NOTICE` for the source package.
-One technique to achieve this goal is to keep separate files within the source
-tree, e.g. `dev/BINARY_NOTICE` and `dev/BINARY_LICENSE`, and to have a build
-script swap them into place when the binary package is assembled.
 Dependencies of Dependencies
@@ -143,8 +127,3 @@ are no different from first-order depend
 `LICENSE` and `NOTICE`: `LICENSE` and `NOTICE` need only be modified to
 accommodate them _if and only if their bits are bundled_.
-Bundling "Weak Copyleft" Dependencies

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message