incubator-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Apache Wiki <wikidi...@apache.org>
Subject [Incubator Wiki] Update of "IncubatorDeconstructionProposal" by ChrisMattmann
Date Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:07:01 GMT
Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Incubator Wiki" for change notification.

The "IncubatorDeconstructionProposal" page has been changed by ChrisMattmann:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorDeconstructionProposal?action=diff&rev1=4&rev2=5

Comment:
use case for documentation request for Incubator docs.

  = Mentors encourage their podlings to operate autonomously =
  general@ is often labeled "the wild west" and for good reason. If I went over to HTTPD and
started spewing my OODT nonsense, many of you would scream foul and blasphemy just like I'd
do if you guys came over into OODT and started flexing "your specific interpretations" of
our commonly agreed upon mantra. That's what general@ is like. I don't think it makes sense,
and I think those mentors who are doing a good job on their projects and those projects that
are doing well would do well the same as TLPs. Many of the other side conversations around
this issue are suggesting that -- why nominate folks for the IPMC when we could simply graduate
the podlings?
  
+ = Use Cases for Future Incubator Documentation Requests to ComDev =
+  1. We rename http://incubator.apache.org/ to http://incubation.apache.org/
+  1. We direct all incoming projects to ComDev (dev@community.a.o) or some other list under
ComDev's perview) to ask questions about Incubator documentation there.
+  1. ComDev list gets question: directs folks to http://incubation.apache.org/ (maybe specific
page, maybe just the main splash landing page).
+ 
  = Shifts in responsibility as part of this proposal =
- ||<tablewidth="962px" tableheight="187px" tablestyle=""style="font-weight:bold;">Committee
||<style="font-weight:bold;">Previous Responsibility ||<style="font-weight:bold;">Revised
Responsibility ||
+ ||<tablewidth="962px" tableheight="187px"style="font-weight:bold;">Committee ||<style="font-weight:bold;">Previous
Responsibility ||<style="font-weight:bold;">Revised Responsibility ||
  ||IPMC ||Binding VOTEs on podling releases ||Now in the hands of all incoming projects.
||
  ||IPMC ||Binding VOTEs on podling new committers ||Now in the hands of all incoming projects
||
  ||IPMC ||Binding VOTEs on incoming projects ||Discharged. ||
@@ -29, +34 @@

  ||IPMC ||Production and dissemination of Incubator documentation ||Now in the hands of ComDev
||
  ||IPMC ||[DISCUSS] and [PROPOSAL] for new incoming projects ||general@incubator remains
for this ||
  ||IPMC ||[VOTE] thread for incoming project ||Now takes place on members@, with recommendation
tallied and sent to board@ by incoming project VP and/or ASF member on incoming PMC. ||
- ||IPMC||Spots problems in the mentoring process||The project's PMC. And if not, the project's
VP. And if not that, the board<<BR>>during the board report. Just like the current
way it works for existing TLPs.||
+ ||IPMC ||Spots problems in the mentoring process ||The project's PMC. And if not, the project's
VP. And if not that, the board during the board report. Just like the current way it works
for existing TLPs. ||
- ||IPMC||Fixes problems with the mentoring process||The project's PMC. And if not, the project's
VP. And if not that, the board,<<BR>>or the membership. Just like the current
way it works for existing TLPs.||
+ ||IPMC ||Fixes problems with the mentoring process ||The project's PMC. And if not, the
project's VP. And if not that, the board or the membership. Just like the current way it works
for existing TLPs. ||
- ||IPMC/Legal PMC/Others?||Maintaining the standards with respect to IP management?||Arguably,
legal and the Legal Committee have a hand in this, no? So, maybe just legal, combined with
the existing documentation?||
+ ||IPMC/Legal PMC/Others? ||Maintaining the standards with respect to IP management? ||Arguably,
legal and the Legal Committee have a hand in this, no? So, maybe just legal, combined with
the existing documentation? ||
  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cvs-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: cvs-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message