incubator-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject cvs commit: incubator-site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/drafts voting.xml
Date Mon, 03 Feb 2003 02:10:43 GMT
fitz        2003/02/02 18:10:43

  Modified:    src/documentation/content/xdocs
               src/documentation/content/xdocs/drafts voting.xml
  Fix some typos. Thanks to Tim O'brien ( for the patch.
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.2       +4 -4      incubator-site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/rules-for-revolutionaries.xml
  Index: rules-for-revolutionaries.xml
  RCS file: /home/cvs/incubator-site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/rules-for-revolutionaries.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.1
  retrieving revision 1.2
  diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
  --- rules-for-revolutionaries.xml	10 Nov 2002 03:04:06 -0000	1.1
  +++ rules-for-revolutionaries.xml	3 Feb 2003 02:10:43 -0000	1.2
  @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@
     So -- in any software development project there is a
     natural tension between revolution and evolution. In a
     closed source environment, you make the call at any
  -  particular time on whether you are in revolutionay mode or
  -  evolutionare mode. For example, JSDK was in evolutionary
  +  particular time on whether you are in revolutionary mode or
  +  evolutionary mode. For example, JSDK was in evolutionary
     mode for years. Then in Nov 98, We made a decision to go
     revolutionary. Of course, at the time the project team was
     composed of 1 person -- me, so it was an easy decision.
  @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
       the group updated on their progress, and allowing others
       who want to help out to do so.  The committer, and the
       group of people who he/she has a attracted are free to
  -    take any approaches they want too free of interference.
  +    take any approaches they want to free of interference.
       2) When a revolution is ready for prime time, the
       committer proposes a merge to the -dev list. At that
  @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
     wants to bring stuff into the trunk, they propose it here
     and we evaluate it on it's merits.
  -  If somebody disagrees with Craigs approach (for the sake
  +  If somebody disagrees with Craig's approach (for the sake
     of argument here), they are free to create a BLUE
     whiteboard and work out what they think is a good
     solution. At that point, the community will have to
  1.8       +1 -1      incubator-site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/drafts/voting.xml
  Index: voting.xml
  RCS file: /home/cvs/incubator-site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/drafts/voting.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.7
  retrieving revision 1.8
  diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
  --- voting.xml	3 Dec 2002 19:48:33 -0000	1.7
  +++ voting.xml	3 Feb 2003 02:10:43 -0000	1.8
  @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
           <title>Expressing Votes: +1, 0, -1, and Fractions</title>
           <p>The voting process in Apache may seem more than a little
  -        weird if you've never enountered it before.  Votes are represented
  +        weird if you've never encountered it before.  Votes are represented
           as numbers between -1 and +1, with '-1' meaning 'no' and '+1'
           meaning 'yes.'</p>
           <p>The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the

View raw message