Mailing-List: contact ctakes-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
From: "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.James@mayo.edu>
To: "ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-170) relation extractor has
 dependency on clinical pipeilne
Thread-Topic: [jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-170) relation extractor has
 dependency on clinical pipeilne
Thread-Index: AQHOETtr5SJVeB/t6kiCquvngbpaqZiGVMfL
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:31:51 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <996FC801C05DF64A84246A106FACACD007F426@MSGPEXCHA08A.mfad.mfroot.org>
References: 
 <JIRA.12633678.1361563986792@arcas>,<JIRA.12633678.1361563986792.325337.1361565014070@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12633678.1361563986792.325337.1361565014070@arcas>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0


sounds good to me.

________________________________________
From: ctakes-notifications-return-414-Masanz.James=3Dmayo.edu@incubator.apa=
che.org [ctakes-notifications-return-414-Masanz.James=3Dmayo.edu@incubator.=
apache.org] on behalf of Tim Miller (JIRA) [jira@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 2:30 PM
To: ctakes-notifications@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-170) relation extractor has dependency =
on clinical pipeilne

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-170?page=3Dcom.atlassian=
.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D1358=
4643#comment-13584643 ]

Tim Miller commented on CTAKES-170:
-----------------------------------

Sorry James for committing this so quickly, I thought the original
direction was an oversight so just fixed it without discussion.

I made a dependency graph with pen and paper this morning when maven was
complaining about a dependency cycle.  My takeaway was that
relation-extractor was somehow screwing everything up by being the only
component pointing the way it was pointing.

Is it ok to leave the fix for now, and pending the results of discussion
on 165 go change it back if necessary later?

Tim


> relation extractor has dependency on clinical pipeilne
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CTAKES-170
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-170
>             Project: cTAKES
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Tim Miller
>            Assignee: Dmitriy Dligach
>            Priority: Minor
>
> dependency should go in the other direction if it is necessary at all.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrato=
rs
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira=