incubator-ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bleeker, Troy C." <Bleeker.T...@mayo.edu>
Subject RE: [jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-170) relation extractor has dependency on clinical pipeilne
Date Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:34:56 GMT
Diagram updated.

-----Original Message-----
From: ctakes-dev-return-1298-Bleeker.Troy=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1298-Bleeker.Troy=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org]
On Behalf Of Masanz, James J.
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 1:52 PM
To: 'ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-170) relation extractor has dependency on clinical
pipeilne

Troy, 

I think we should show ctakes-relation-extractor in the component descriptor diagram as dependent
on Constituency Parser (as a sibling of Coref-Resolver).

Note for right now at least relation extractor, within RelationExtractorAggregate.xml, does
reference a couple analysis engine descriptors from ctakes-clinical-pipeline, such as

                    <delegateAnalysisEngine key="ExtractionPrepAnnotator">
                        <import location="../../../ctakes-clinical-pipeline/desc/analysis_engine/ExtractionPrepAnnotator.xml"/>
                    </delegateAnalysisEngine>

See http://s.apache.org/trunk-RelationExtractorAggregate.xml 

And the class for that annotator is within package  org.apache.ctakes.clinicalpipeline.ae

Also, it's a little messy as far as the diagram because it looks like relation-extractor is
using StatusAnnotator and NegationAnnotator instead of AssertionAnnotator. 

I just created JIRA issue  CTAKES-172 "relation-extractor is using StatusAnnotator and NegationAnnotator
instead of AssertionAnnotator"

Regards,
James Masanz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ctakes-notifications-return-416- 
> Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org 
> [mailto:ctakes-notifications- 
> return-416-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] On Behalf Of 
> Troy Bleeker (JIRA)
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:00 PM
> To: ctakes-notifications@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-170) relation extractor has 
> dependency on clinical pipeilne
> 
> 
>     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-
> 170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-
> tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13584750#comment-13584750 ]
> 
> Troy Bleeker commented on CTAKES-170:
> -------------------------------------
> 
> Made me think of the component dependencies diagram. This diagram is 
> helpful for newcomers to understand these kind of dependencies.
> Relation extractor needs to be added. I can do that if you tell me 
> where it goes, optional or not, who depends on its output.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CTAKES/cTAKES+3.0+Componen
> t+
> Use+Guide
> 
> Thanks
> Troy
> 
> 
> > relation extractor has dependency on clinical pipeilne
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: CTAKES-170
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-170
> >             Project: cTAKES
> >          Issue Type: Bug
> >            Reporter: Tim Miller
> >            Assignee: Dmitriy Dligach
> >            Priority: Minor
> >
> > dependency should go in the other direction if it is necessary at all.
> 
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA 
> administrators For more information on JIRA, see:
> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Mime
View raw message