incubator-ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bleeker, Troy C." <Bleeker.T...@mayo.edu>
Subject RE: [jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-170) relation extractor has dependency on clinical pipeilne
Date Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:58:48 GMT
Made me think of the component dependencies diagram. This diagram is helpful for newcomers
to understand these kind of dependencies.
Relation extractor needs to be added. I can do that if you tell me where it goes, optional
or not, who depends on its output.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CTAKES/cTAKES+3.0+Component+Use+Guide

Thanks
Troy
-----Original Message-----
From: ctakes-dev-return-1287-Bleeker.Troy=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1287-Bleeker.Troy=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org]
On Behalf Of Masanz, James J.
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 2:32 PM
To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-170) relation extractor has dependency on clinical
pipeilne


sounds good to me.

________________________________________
From: ctakes-notifications-return-414-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org [ctakes-notifications-return-414-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org]
on behalf of Tim Miller (JIRA) [jira@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 2:30 PM
To: ctakes-notifications@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-170) relation extractor has dependency on clinical pipeilne

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13584643#comment-13584643
]

Tim Miller commented on CTAKES-170:
-----------------------------------

Sorry James for committing this so quickly, I thought the original direction was an oversight
so just fixed it without discussion.

I made a dependency graph with pen and paper this morning when maven was complaining about
a dependency cycle.  My takeaway was that relation-extractor was somehow screwing everything
up by being the only component pointing the way it was pointing.

Is it ok to leave the fix for now, and pending the results of discussion on 165 go change
it back if necessary later?

Tim




> relation extractor has dependency on clinical pipeilne
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CTAKES-170
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-170
>             Project: cTAKES
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Tim Miller
>            Assignee: Dmitriy Dligach
>            Priority: Minor
>
> dependency should go in the other direction if it is necessary at all.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information
on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message