incubator-ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Date Sat, 19 Jan 2013 20:30:38 GMT
Great job! Feel free to close the LEGAL issue now.

On 1/19/13 11:53 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.James@mayo.edu> wrote:

>Now that 48 hours passed since I added the comment to LEGAL-154 about
>lazy consensus, I've added another comment that cTAKES will proceed by
>lazy consensus with including the index of words and word counts.
>
>-- James
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>> 
>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>]
>> On Behalf Of Masanz, James J.
>> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:40 AM
>> To: 'ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org'
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>> 
>> Thanks Chris!
>> I added such a comment to LEGAL-154.
>> 
>> -- James
>> 
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From:
>> > ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>> > [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
>> > org]
>> > On Behalf Of Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:33 AM
>> > To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>> >
>> > Hi James,
>> >
>> >
>> > On 1/17/13 7:14 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.James@mayo.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> > >Pei had opened LEGAL-154
>> > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-154
>> > >and that received a comment from Craig L Russell, stating the
>> > >intended use seemed ok to him.
>> > >
>> > >Can you suggest how we should proceed with that so the issue can be
>> > >considered 'cleared'?
>> >
>> > Yep here's how: put a comment on that issue that via lazy consensus,
>> > you are going to assume that in 48 hours if there are no objections
>> > that everyone is happy with Craig's comment and that cTAKES will
>> proceed.
>> >
>> > In the meanwhile the VOTE just stays open and hopefully in 48 hours,
>> > Jukka and/or others will be willing to give it a +1 at that point.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Chris
>> >
>> > >
>> > >Thanks,
>> > >James Masanz
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From:
>> > >> ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>> > >>
>> > 
>>>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
>> > >>org
>> > >>]
>> > >> On Behalf Of Jukka Zitting
>> > >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:30 AM
>> > >> To: ctakes-dev
>> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei
>> > >> <Pei.Chen@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> > >> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate
as
>> > >>Apache
>> > >> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating.
>> > >>
>> > >> +0
>> > >>
>> > >> The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable voting
>> > >>+1 if  the licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented better
>> > >>and ideally  cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about
>> > >>the data falling  under the normal contributor license sounds
>> > >>convincing, but I'm not  intimate enough with copyright law to be
>> > >>able to tell whether those files  could instead be interpreted as
>> > >>derivative works of the upstream data and  thus constrained by the
>> upstream license.
>> > >>
>> > >> BR,
>> > >>
>> > >> Jukka Zitting
>


Mime
View raw message