incubator-ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chen, Pei" <Pei.C...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Date Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:41:11 GMT
Sorry was away the weekend.
Closed this issue now per comment:
Since it's been more than 48 hours, by lazy consensus, cTAKES will proceed with including
the index of word counts derived from some wikipedia articles.

________________________________________
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 10:24 PM
To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release

Ahh OK James, sorry forgot Pei opened it.

Pei, can you please close it?

Thanks!

Cheers,
Chris

On 1/19/13 6:49 PM, "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.James@mayo.edu> wrote:

>Hi Chris,
>
>I don't have access to close the LEGAL issue that Pei opened. Am I
>supposed to get that or is that limited to some subgroup of Apache
>committers
>
>________________________________________
>From: ctakes-dev-return-1067-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>[ctakes-dev-return-1067-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] on
>behalf of Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov]
>Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 2:30 PM
>To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>
>Great job! Feel free to close the LEGAL issue now.
>
>On 1/19/13 11:53 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.James@mayo.edu> wrote:
>
>>Now that 48 hours passed since I added the comment to LEGAL-154 about
>>lazy consensus, I've added another comment that cTAKES will proceed by
>>lazy consensus with including the index of words and word counts.
>>
>>-- James
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.or
>>>g
>>>]
>>> On Behalf Of Masanz, James J.
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:40 AM
>>> To: 'ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org'
>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>>>
>>> Thanks Chris!
>>> I added such a comment to LEGAL-154.
>>>
>>> -- James
>>>
>>>
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From:
>>> > ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>> >
>>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
>>> > org]
>>> > On Behalf Of Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>>> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:33 AM
>>> > To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>>> >
>>> > Hi James,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 1/17/13 7:14 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.James@mayo.edu> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >Pei had opened LEGAL-154
>>> > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-154
>>> > >and that received a comment from Craig L Russell, stating the
>>> > >intended use seemed ok to him.
>>> > >
>>> > >Can you suggest how we should proceed with that so the issue can be
>>> > >considered 'cleared'?
>>> >
>>> > Yep here's how: put a comment on that issue that via lazy consensus,
>>> > you are going to assume that in 48 hours if there are no objections
>>> > that everyone is happy with Craig's comment and that cTAKES will
>>> proceed.
>>> >
>>> > In the meanwhile the VOTE just stays open and hopefully in 48 hours,
>>> > Jukka and/or others will be willing to give it a +1 at that point.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Chris
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >Thanks,
>>> > >James Masanz
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>>> > >> From:
>>> > >> ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
>>> > >>org
>>> > >>]
>>> > >> On Behalf Of Jukka Zitting
>>> > >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:30 AM
>>> > >> To: ctakes-dev
>>> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Hi,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei
>>> > >> <Pei.Chen@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>> > >> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate
>>>as
>>> > >>Apache
>>> > >> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> +0
>>> > >>
>>> > >> The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable
>>>voting
>>> > >>+1 if  the licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented
>>>better
>>> > >>and ideally  cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about
>>> > >>the data falling  under the normal contributor license sounds
>>> > >>convincing, but I'm not  intimate enough with copyright law to be
>>> > >>able to tell whether those files  could instead be interpreted as
>>> > >>derivative works of the upstream data and  thus constrained by the
>>> upstream license.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> BR,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Jukka Zitting
>>
>


Mime
View raw message