incubator-ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Finan, Sean" <Sean.Fi...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject RE: Apache Confluence wiki for documentation?
Date Fri, 14 Sep 2012 21:24:14 GMT
Value working software above extensive documentation

-----Original Message-----
From: Chen, Pei [mailto:Pei.Chen@childrens.harvard.edu] 
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 5:21 PM
To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Apache Confluence wiki for documentation?

We just need to build software that doesn't require a manual to use ;)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bleeker, Troy C. [mailto:Bleeker.Troy@mayo.edu]
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 5:06 PM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Apache Confluence wiki for documentation?
> 
> Right. There has always been one version of the doc per release online 
> and would continue to be done the same. If you ship it with the 
> release there is still a version of the help for every release. That's 
> true if you contend for a doc fix that could only go into one release 
> and not the next.  For example, you could document a work-around in 
> 2.6, fix the problem in 3.0, and now the 3.0 documentation needs none 
> of the 2.6 wording. So you're still building separate versions when shipped with the
releases.
> 
> Thanks
> Troy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ctakes-dev-return-393-
> Bleeker.Troy=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org [mailto:ctakes-dev-return- 
> 393-Bleeker.Troy=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] On Behalf Of Britt 
> Fitch
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 3:59 PM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Confluence wiki for documentation?
> 
> I also like to have documentation shipped with the code. If 
> documentation is web only then there needs to be multiple versions 
> maintained anyway, otherwise you force everyone to update to have support.
> 
> Britt
> 
> On Sep 14, 2012, at 10:26 AM, Jörn Kottmann <kottmann@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 09/14/2012 04:19 PM, Masanz, James J. wrote:
> >> I also prefer to not distribute the documentation with the release.
> >
> > I actually prefer to have the documentation included in the 
> > distribution, because then I can always easily access the 
> > documentation which matches the version I am working with and do not 
> > have to go somewhere to find it.
> >
> > Jörn
Mime
View raw message