incubator-ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.Ja...@mayo.edu>
Subject RE: INFRA-5079 (cTAKES svn import)
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:49:19 GMT
+1 on closing infra-5079 and using what's in apache SVN
(and using SF.net if we want to look at history)

Regards, 
James Masanz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ctakes-dev-return-373-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
> [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-373-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org]
> On Behalf Of Chen, Pei
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 9:45 AM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: INFRA-5079 (cTAKES svn import)
> 
> Yes Jörn.  Since we already have the latest export of the code already in
> the current Apache SVN, I would prefer with #1 mainly for simplicity.  It
> may not be so straightforward to merge code/fixes especially once we start
> renaming project folders and namespaces.  If others are okay with it, we
> can ask to close the infra-5079 jira and move forward with the latest svn
> codebase sans the old revision history; for the unlikely chance we may
> need the history, we can go to SF files or the dump file.
> 
> --Pei
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jörn Kottmann [mailto:kottmann@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 10:13 AM
> > To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: INFRA-5079 (cTAKES svn import)
> >
> > There is already a ping on the issue from the 7th September, but there
> > was no reply since then.
> >
> > Jörn
> >
> > On 09/11/2012 11:36 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> > > Did you hear anything regarding this? Otherwise we either proceed
> > > with
> > > #1/#2 or by now we can also ping the infra guys.
> > >
> > > Jörn
> > >
> > > On 08/30/2012 05:15 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> > >> Hi Guys,
> > >>
> > >> +1 to option #3 as well, with a deadline of say early next week. If
> > >> it's not done by
> > >> early next week, #1 or #2 sound fine.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Chris
> > >>
> > >> On Aug 30, 2012, at 8:11 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 to do alternative 3 for a while. The last mail which said they
> > >>> do it Wednesday sounded to me like it will happen really soon.
> > >>>
> > >>> Jörn
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 08/30/2012 04:57 PM, Chen, Pei wrote:
> > >>>> Hi cTAKES Mentors,
> > >>>> The request to perform the svn import is taking longer than
> > >>>> anticipated (It's been some time now with several follow up's
> > >>>> with infra, but still no luck)...
> > >>>> Any suggestions here to move the incubation process along?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Throwing out some alternatives:
> > >>>> 1) Do we really need the full revision history from SF on Apache?
> > >>>> It would be nice, but don't want to wait indefinitely to begin
> > >>>> coding either.
> > >>>> 2) We start development on the apache svn. Ask infra if it's
> > >>>> possible to preserve this folder when they perform the import,
> > >>>> and we perform a merge any time after the import. This would mean
> > >>>> developers would have to configure their workspace multiple times
> > >>>> and we'll need to figure out the merges.
> > >>>> 3) Continue waiting for infra.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Open to ideas...
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Pei
> > >>
> > >>
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > ++++++++
> > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> > >> Senior Computer Scientist
> > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> > >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> > >> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> > >> WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> > >>
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > ++++++++
> > >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University
> > >> of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> > >>
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > ++++++++
> > >>
> > >


Mime
View raw message