incubator-ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Savova, Guergana" <Guergana.Sav...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject RE: cTAKES 2.6 - packaging of deliverable - was RE: [jira] [Closed] (CTAKES-34) icTAKES.jar is missing from the .gz distributions
Date Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:10:22 GMT
+1 to support our previous decision.
--Guergana

-----Original Message-----
From: Chen, Pei [mailto:Pei.Chen@childrens.harvard.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 5:02 PM
To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: cTAKES 2.6 - packaging of deliverable - was RE: [jira] [Closed] (CTAKES-34) icTAKES.jar
is missing from the .gz distributions

Ditto +1 on separate jars,
But, I actually don't think there is any contention here.  I believe this was an old SF ticket
that was left behind.
Since, icTAKES.tar.gz doesn't exist anymore, I think this Jira is a moot point in my point
of view so hence it was closed.

Since we moved to Apache, I would strongly advise us to allow the person who will be actually
doing the work (to use Maven or not, etc.) the freedom to make this decision.

--Pei

-----Original Message-----
From: Coarr, Matt [mailto:mcoarr@mitre.org] 
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:59 PM
To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: cTAKES 2.6 - packaging of deliverable - was RE: [jira] [Closed] (CTAKES-34) icTAKES.jar
is missing from the .gz distributions

My vote is to continue in the direction of the previous vote -- one jar file produced for
each module.  This will align the development (svn
trunk) work using either eclipse or the command line more closely with the execution of the
binary release (jar only) environment.

This will also set us up for a smooth migration to maven.

My $0.02,
Matt


Mime
View raw message