incubator-ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.Ja...@mayo.edu>
Subject RE: cTAKES 2.6 - packaging of deliverable - was RE: [jira] [Closed] (CTAKES-34) icTAKES.jar is missing from the .gz distributions
Date Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:46:09 GMT

I had been thinking it would be 2.6-incubating since we are not tackling
all the maven work we could.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ctakes-dev-return-307-
> Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-
> 307-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] On Behalf Of Chen,
> Pei
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 5:00 PM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: cTAKES 2.6 - packaging of deliverable - was RE: [jira]
[Closed]
> (CTAKES-34) icTAKES.jar is missing from the .gz distributions
> 
> Troy,
> 
> > That may be the key, "use Maven's plugin to assist in building and
> releasing".
> > James said, " the move to Apache's SVN was a big enough change that
we
> > would wait to do the maven work until some following release (after
> > 2.6)" If what James thought was true then we would use the exact
same
> build in 2.6.
> > However, is sounds like that's not true and the build process will
> > change in
> > 2.6 at the same time as it changes over to be built from the SVN
> > repository at Apache.
> 
> No change here- This particular Bug Tracker item referred to a missing
file to
> an old release dating back to ~8 months ago.
> I believe that is still the plan; Create a 2.6-incubating release that
looks like
> what would have been in sourceforge (whatever zip/jar structure format
> that was in 2.x). See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-13
> 
> > So that's no problem if we have the time to put in for 2.6, great.
But
> > change means design so doesn't the question remain, "What will be
> > built?". We don't want to assume what will come out. Maybe it's so
> > simple everyone else understands it. I was thinking that delivering
to
> > developers is easy because there is no pre-build. They just download
> > from SVN and away they go. What about the zip file resulting from
the
> > 2.6 build? What will be in there? Is it option F? Will the directory
> > structure in the zip file match that of SVN? In 2.5 they do not
match.
> 
> Let's get the repo and a baseline version in Apache SVN up and running
first-
> I'll ping infra again...  once we have that, I think we can create
whatever
> binary executable format that is agreed upon here since this will be a
brand
> new major release with new org.apache name spaces (3.0-incubating?)...
> 
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ctakes-dev-return-300-
> > Bleeker.Troy=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
> > [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-300-
> > Bleeker.Troy=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
> > ] On Behalf Of Chen, Pei
> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:08 PM
> > To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: cTAKES 2.6 - packaging of deliverable - was RE: [jira]
> > [Closed]
> > (CTAKES-34) icTAKES.jar is missing from the .gz distributions
> >
> > Note:
> > Just in case you're curious, was actually planning to use Maven's
> > plugin (Shade and Release) to assist in building and releasing...
> >
> > In case you're interested, feel free to them check out:
> > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/index.html
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chen, Pei [mailto:Pei.Chen@childrens.harvard.edu]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 5:02 PM
> > To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: cTAKES 2.6 - packaging of deliverable - was RE: [jira]
> > [Closed]
> > (CTAKES-34) icTAKES.jar is missing from the .gz distributions
> >
> > Ditto +1 on separate jars,
> > But, I actually don't think there is any contention here.  I believe
> > this was an old SF ticket that was left behind.
> > Since, icTAKES.tar.gz doesn't exist anymore, I think this Jira is a
> > moot point in my point of view so hence it was closed.
> >
> > Since we moved to Apache, I would strongly advise us to allow the
> > person who will be actually doing the work (to use Maven or not,
etc.)
> > the freedom to make this decision.
> >
> > --Pei
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Coarr, Matt [mailto:mcoarr@mitre.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:59 PM
> > To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: cTAKES 2.6 - packaging of deliverable - was RE: [jira]
> > [Closed]
> > (CTAKES-34) icTAKES.jar is missing from the .gz distributions
> >
> > My vote is to continue in the direction of the previous vote -- one
> > jar file produced for each module.  This will align the development
> > (svn
> > trunk) work using either eclipse or the command line more closely
with
> > the execution of the binary release (jar only) environment.
> >
> > This will also set us up for a smooth migration to maven.
> >
> > My $0.02,
> > Matt


Mime
View raw message