incubator-ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Finan, Sean" <Sean.Fi...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject RE: SVN source structure for Apache cTAKES?
Date Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:30:09 GMT
Re: using a "non-standard" directory structure ...

My apologies, and thanks for the link to the maven site.  I have never developed a product
that used Maven, so this was news to me.  I agree with Jörn (thanks for the defense!) in
that it is our choice and we should do what we feel is best (the point of this whole discussion),
but I would like to retract my vote against something that is an accepted standard.  I haven't
seen this structure "in use" for a decade (except legacy products), and I think that src/main/
and src/test/ and src/site grows the tree unnecessarily, but oh well.  I honestly thought
that the standard was progressing away from this, and I don't like it, but I can deal with
it.   

Cheers again for the link,
Sean

-----Original Message-----
From: Jörn Kottmann [mailto:kottmann@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:46 PM
To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: SVN source structure for Apache cTAKES?

On 07/19/2012 01:04 AM, Steven Bethard wrote:
> -1 on inventing our own directory structure instead of using the Standard Directory Layout:
>
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html
>
> Using the Standard Directory Layout will make configuring Maven easier. It has t

Not everyone is using maven in this world.

The project is free to choose which ever build tool they prefer.

Many Apache projects use maven and its a good tool to make a
release of an Apache project, because many things work more
or less out of the box with the Apache parent pom.

Jörn


Mime
View raw message