incubator-ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.Ja...@mayo.edu>
Subject RE: podling release managment
Date Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:34:50 GMT
+1 having the resource downloaded separately

Regards, 
James Masanz


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ctakes-dev-return-179-
> Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-
> 179-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] On Behalf Of Chen,
> Pei
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 11:29 AM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: podling release managment
> 
> I was thinking the same;
> Perhaps we could leave the source code as is (validation check, etc.), but
> have the resource be downloaded separately by Maven or other tool to be
> compliant with ASF?
> Of course, if we change this mechanism, we'll also have to inform the NLM.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jörn Kottmann [mailto:kottmann@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 12:24 PM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: podling release managment
> 
> On 07/26/2012 06:17 PM, Chen, Pei wrote:
> > 1) Bundle the customized UMLS dictionaries that were designed to work
> > with cTAKES as a resource.  Have code to perform a License validation
> > check via their web service upon init time.  [There is a known caveat
> > that users could bypass this check by modifying the open source code
> > or attempting to use the special in-memory db resource files
> > directly.]
> 
> Bundling (or distributing from Apache) can only be done if the UMLS
> dictionaries are under AL 2.0 or similar terms.
> The License validation check makes it sound like its really not licensed under
> an OS license or something which comes close.
> 
> Jörn

Mime
View raw message