incubator-crunch-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Josh Wills (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CRUNCH-132) Repeated runs result in duplicated output data
Date Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:30:13 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13531363#comment-13531363
] 

Josh Wills commented on CRUNCH-132:
-----------------------------------

@Gabriel +1-- all three are valid options under different circumstances. I've never been totally
sure what the API/impl for this should look like: should it live on Target? Should it be an
option you can specify when creating a new Target? Should it be orthogonal to Target, since
in some sense you could say that these options apply for any Path-related Target (although
I'm not sure what makes sense for HBase targets.) Maybe something on Pipeline.write, with
an option for setting a global default strategy for the Pipeline as a whole?

This would be a fair amount of work to do, so it would be good to have a loose consensus on
the approach before we go down one of these paths.
                
> Repeated runs result in duplicated output data
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CRUNCH-132
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-132
>             Project: Crunch
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>            Reporter: Dave Beech
>
> Usually when you run a mapreduce job and the output directory already exists, the job
fails (won't start). A Crunch job does run, but results in the output data being duplicated
in the output directory with numbered files that follow on from the previous run. 
> Example
> Run 1, single reducer /output -> /output/part-r-00000
> Run 2, single reducer /output -> /output/part-r-00000, /output/part-r-00001
> I didn't realise I'd run my job twice, so when I looked in the directory it seemed that
there had been 2 reducers and somehow the output had been generated twice, which was confusing.

> I realise this may be by design, but it feels wrong to me. I'd prefer if the behaviour
of a standard mapreduce job was preserved.  

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message