Mailing-List: contact crunch-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: crunch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 09:19:51 +0200
From: Matthias Friedrich <matt@mafr.de>
To: crunch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Code Reviews
Message-ID: <20121027071951.GA6535@mafr.de>
Mail-Followup-To: crunch-dev@incubator.apache.org
References: <20121013131139.GA8589@mafr.de>
 <20121019150159.GA19242@mafr.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121019150159.GA19242@mafr.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Hi,

according to INFRA, RB should now work for us. Apparently there was
some issue fetching our git repo.

Regards,
  Matthias

On Friday, 2012-10-19, Matthias Friedrich wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we now have a ReviewBoard group for Crunch, with notifications going
> to crunch-dev.
> 
> Regards,
>   Matthias
> 
> On Saturday, 2012-10-13, Matthias Friedrich wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Apache runs a ReviewBoard instance [1]. I don't have a lot of
> > experience with review software, but I think it would help us
> > streamline our process. I expect reviewing large patches and
> > suggesting changes would work much better on ReviewBoard than
> > on JIRA.
> > 
> > I'd suggest that patches should still be attached to a JIRA issue
> > (it's necessary for legal reasons anyway), but larger ones can
> > additionally be posted to ReviewBoard.
> > 
> > It looks like everybody can create accounts at ReviewBoard but
> > INFRA needs to set up a group for Crunch. I'd make a ticket if
> > we decide to give it a try.
> > 
> > Regards,
> >   Matthias
> > 
> > [1] https://reviews.apache.org