incubator-crunch-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rahul <rsha...@xebia.com>
Subject Re: Crunch 0.4.0 release preparation
Date Wed, 31 Oct 2012 05:41:56 GMT
Hi Josh,

CRUNCH-105 would be a great new feature to have. CRUNCH-97 can be a nice 
add-on if possible.
Also I would like to see fixes for CRUNCH-51 and CRUNCH-60 but I think 
they are not ready yet and should not hold the release.

regards,
Rahul

On 31-10-2012 03:58, Josh Wills wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Gabriel Reid <gabriel.reid@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> Yep, I'd like to include CRUNCH-105 as well if possible.
>>
>> The only other potential issue that I see for inclusion is CRUNCH-51
>> (fixing sorting to use multiple reducers). I actually think that this one
>> is
>> still too far from being ready, but I just want to put that out there to
>> make
>> sure it's clear that it's not (yet) in.
>>
> Understood. I would have liked to get MSCR fusion and the text parsing
> stuff in too, but they're not there yet.
>
>
>> - Gabriel
>>
>> On 30 Oct 2012, at 22:51, Josh Wills <jwills@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to get our final preparations in place for the 0.4.0 Crunch
>>> release. Among the remaining issues, the only things that seem required
>> for
>>> the release are CRUNCH-63 (including the CHANGES.txt file), although it
>>> would be great to include CRUNCH-105 (DOT files for the planner) if at
>> all
>>> possible.
>>>
>>> I cc'd Roman on here so we can be sure that we position the release to be
>>> compatible w/Bigtop. Thanks to Matthias, we have both support for .tar.gz
>>> release files and binary release artifacts. We're using Hadoop 1.0.3 as
>> our
>>> default build target, although it is possible to do the build against the
>>> Hadoop 2.0.x APIs via the crunch.platform property in the top-level POM
>>> file.
>>>
>>> Question for everyone: is there anything else you would like to include
>> in
>>> 0.4.0 that is close to completion?
>>> Question for Roman: is there anything else we should double-check on for
>>> Bigtop compatibility?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Josh
>>>
>>> --
>>> Director of Data Science
>>> Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com>
>>> Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message