Mailing-List: contact crunch-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: crunch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of josh.wills@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20120802194356.GA22694@mafr.de>
References: <20120728154609.GA23060@mafr.de>
 <CAH29n6ODCCVnTOMba3hXnV5_OPu_bTtT-s=4U9HHJ81bGNPHiA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120802194356.GA22694@mafr.de>
From: Josh Wills <josh.wills@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:28:24 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CANb5z2+pESvDb2get8uSGgQNUHcaHqHcVNEwx-mhphcyG0VZmw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Namespace for Crunch modules
To: crunch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Matthias Friedrich <matt@mafr.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> answers inlined.
>
> On Saturday, 2012-07-28, Josh Wills wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Matthias Friedrich <matt@mafr.de> wrote:
>
> [ rename crunch module to crunch-core ]
>
>> My model for this is avro-- org.apache.avro.* is the core framework and has
>> the artifactId "avro", whereas the other components are "avro-mapred",
>> "avro-tool", etc. So keeping the core named "crunch" is my preference. I'm
>> not all that worried about further modularization of the core.
>
> OK, fair enough.
>
>>> Module "scrunch":
>
>>> Maven coordinates are currently "org.apache.crunch:scrunch" but the
>>> Scala packages are in "org.apache.scrunch"; I don't know if we're
>>> allowed to use this namespace. If not, I'd suggest to use
>>> "org.apache.crunch.scrunch" and maybe even change the Maven module
>>> to "crunch-scala" (because "crunch-scrunch" sounds really, really
>>> weird).
>
>> Yeah, we should probably do this. It's a pain, but that namespace isn't
>> ours.
>
> OK, so the groupId stays "org.apache.crunch". What about the artifactId?
> Leave it at "scrunch" or change it to "crunch-scala" or "crunch-scrunch"?

crunch-scrunch seems the most consistent, although crunch-scala is
more descriptive. I'm indifferent.

>
> The package names should probably match groupId and artifactId. Change
> the base package to "org.apache.crunch.scrunch"?

Yes, I'm afraid so.

>
>>> Module "examples":
>
>>> I'd change the module name to "crunch-examples" to match the
>>> artifactId.
>
>> +1.
>
> OK.
>
> Once we have consensus on Scrunch's coordinates I'll create a JIRA
> issue for it. We should do this before our first Apache release.
>
> Regards,
>   Matthias