Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABvT1DG3TyPmmMJBaNtP5J67K11e45R41J7CHZaoymqASZqPQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAP1BHJajBHWF1hjitUSEddfvQg9WjkrsWs8fYpuaRR4M8kREjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BED15BF2-CEAE-438B-9ABF-6E8D9E9D75FC@couchbase.com>
	<CABvT1DG3TyPmmMJBaNtP5J67K11e45R41J7CHZaoymqASZqPQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:13:56 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAP1BHJZK+dWY1Drh3z_oSogowu7k_V5YxcYj=S5cJNK37Y4W_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How to configure a limit on simultaneous replications?
From: "R.J. Steinert" <rj@rjsteinert.com>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b10cac5538c0704eda91954

--047d7b10cac5538c0704eda91954
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

@Jens We're testing over a strong Internet connection. My laptop for
example has no problem doing this replication in the couple of seconds you
have also experienced, the Raspberry Pi on the other hand...

@Robert Thanks for chiming in. Unfortunately I'm no Erlang expert so I
won't be much help. I may however look at writing a replication manager in
Javascript, perhaps contributing it to the PouchDB project.


On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:

> If you mean the _replicator database then, yes, currently it will
> attempt to run all the jobs at once. That is, there is Considerable
> Room For Improvement.
>
> B.
>
>
> On 26 November 2013 19:10, Jens Alfke <jens@couchbase.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 26, 2013, at 10:07 AM, R.J. Steinert <rj@rjsteinert.com> wrote:
> >
> >> when CouchDB tries to replicate them all at once, the replications
> >> never seem to finish in a dependable fashion. Sometimes some of the
> >> databases will finish replicating others will hang for days. Each
> database
> >> is only a couple dozen KB so these replication processes aren't
> managing a
> >> whole lot of data.
> >
> > That=92s weird. What sort of network connection is the replication usin=
g?
> Is this over a LAN (WiFi or Ethernet), a wider-range Internet connection,=
 a
> cell network=85? Basically the slower / laggier / flakier the network is,=
 the
> more roadblocks are thrown in the way of the replicator. It should still
> work reliably, though, so what you=92re describing sounds like a bug; a d=
ozen
> tiny databases should be able to replicate in a few seconds unless there
> are major network issues.
> >
> > (Disclaimer: I am not familiar with the replicator implementation in
> CouchDB itself, although I have implemented compatible replicators so I
> know the protocol well.)
> >
> > =97Jens
>

--047d7b10cac5538c0704eda91954--