Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of adam.kocoloski@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.41 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: Doc Not Restored After PURGE
From: Adam Kocoloski <kocolosk@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABu8_fXCDkwBAj6hD6ZtBs2dAf3AFsOR+9LTX_Y9PscKPEwZLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:49:04 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D7B119CF-F88E-4AA0-B20A-69E8AC9C326D@apache.org>
References: 
 <CABu8_fXCDkwBAj6hD6ZtBs2dAf3AFsOR+9LTX_Y9PscKPEwZLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org

That's definitely one of the dangerous bits about purge.  If you do a =
noop update to doc2 on theSource and then replicate it should make its =
way to theTarget.

Adam

On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:04 PM, Brad Rhoads <bdrhoa@gmail.com> wrote:

> Say I have two databases, theSource and theTarget, then:
>=20
> Add docs 1,2 & 3 to theSource.
> Replicate theSource to theTarget.
> PURGE doc 2 from theTarget.
> Replicate theSource to theTarget again.
>=20
> I'd expect doc 2 to be restored to theTarget, but it is not being =
resorted.
>=20
> I've tested this in 1.2 and 1.3. I don't have 1.4 setup yet, so I =
haven't
> tested this senario  on 1.4.
>=20
> Am I misunderstanding how this is supposed to work, or is there a bug?
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
> -Brad
>=20
>=20
> ---------------------------
> www.maf.org/rhoads
> www.ontherhoads.org