Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3497E1067E for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76023 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2013 22:27:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 75983 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2013 22:27:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 75975 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2013 22:27:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:27:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jens@couchbase.com designates 206.225.164.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [206.225.164.29] (HELO EXHUB020-2.exch020.serverdata.net) (206.225.164.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:27:06 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX020-1.exch020.serverdata.net ([169.254.4.151]) by EXHUB020-2.exch020.serverdata.net ([206.225.164.29]) with mapi; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:26:43 -0700 From: Jens Alfke To: "user@couchdb.apache.org" Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:26:43 -0700 Subject: Re: Doc Not Restored After PURGE Thread-Topic: Doc Not Restored After PURGE Thread-Index: Ac7QPvOZuGbnOjqLQF6fz+n19nr0Dg== Message-ID: References: ,<89818221-910A-47BE-A69E-66D93A730B56@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 23, 2013, at 3:07 PM, Jay Clark wrote: > What about if a COMPACT were performed on theTarget before replicating ag= ain from theSource? Does that affect replication and which docs get checked= ? No, compact doesn=92t affect sequence numbers or replication checkpoints. (= In normal circumstances you don=92t want checkpoints to be invalidated, bec= ause it makes the next replication really slow, as it has to compare the re= visions of every single document.) There might be a property you can set in the replication=92s JSON spec to f= orce a reset from sequence 0; I can=92t recall now whether that exists or w= hat it=92s called. =97Jens=