Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CA4D10F36 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 03:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83226 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2013 03:14:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 83158 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2013 03:14:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 83146 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2013 03:14:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 03:14:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of siriele2x3@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.175] (HELO mail-wi0-f175.google.com) (209.85.212.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 03:14:43 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hq12so2699440wib.14 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:14:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=BxGAAmBoaDTQ9X0A5JaTX3EbZmuhHjWrytdL1YIUjrM=; b=LaAPms2JtMKK33l4wG+MGoFhA4fBnd1r4x/wMngS/3xSiEzVL5OJYXpxqZzOOJKFEN nNilSQMOm/nYBzaeU7eV4/tX5b8i/uIY7XzaYZPxjl9WZn1ysZIxjPLyGHzhwmZiFJyn OnsrO9+BbkhyGznxzyhQA8lCi3QbRy+z1Go+ctg0NxSmHlc0knyly3+hF927VyBbNmtI hTLMppSXReT0z88G8dyifIuCiQ+amNW2jwxgXAgAy+58GVPUJ3IodgSHBwAZJ/YYKAbY H/EMgajJKhTZeBwC+cKjMyhmCwxvjF1MTTNIWd7v4NndnmIGkJA/+HyBg3E8GwMmiuT5 hN8g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.201.131 with SMTP id ka3mr6584023wjc.22.1376536463389; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.58.244 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.58.244 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:14:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:14:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Erlang vs JavaScript From: Stanley Iriele To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b873adcebba9b04e3f3dec9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b873adcebba9b04e3f3dec9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 True... But the only way for that to happen is for them to bypass several other layers of security... In which case I'd have much bigger problems to worry about On Aug 14, 2013 8:08 PM, "Andrey Kuprianov" wrote: > So far it seems very promising. :) However, what they say can happen is > that since Erlang code has no sandbox, anything could be done to the system > through design views, if your database is compromised. > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Stanley Iriele >wrote: > > > 5-6 times eh?...that would give me an honest reason for picking up Erlang > > again....I'm going to try converting all of my views to Erlang and see > what > > happens..what's the worst that can happen? :-) > > On Aug 14, 2013 7:55 PM, "Andrey Kuprianov" > > > wrote: > > > > > I had a 5-6 times speed boost yesterday, after converting one of my > > design > > > docs to Erlang. Like a breath of fresh air, if you ask me. > > > > > > Andrey > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Stanley Iriele > > >wrote: > > > > > > > I'm curious... What exactly is the performance gain from writing > > > > views/shows/ etc in Erlang vs JavaScript... From what I've seen the > > > > JavaScript view server is sufficiently fast and feature complete. > > > > > > > > So my question is this.... Is the Erlang view server that much > > faster?... > > > > Is there another gain that I'm missing?..and is it as feature > complete > > as > > > > the JavaScript equivalent? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Stanley > > > > > > > > > > --047d7b873adcebba9b04e3f3dec9--