incubator-couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrey Kuprianov <andrey.koupria...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Erlang vs JavaScript
Date Thu, 15 Aug 2013 03:07:59 GMT
So far it seems very promising. :) However, what they say can happen is
that since Erlang code has no sandbox, anything could be done to the system
through design views, if your database is compromised.


On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Stanley Iriele <siriele2x3@gmail.com>wrote:

> 5-6 times eh?...that would give me an honest reason for picking up Erlang
> again....I'm going to try converting all of my views to Erlang and see what
> happens..what's the worst that can happen? :-)
> On Aug 14, 2013 7:55 PM, "Andrey Kuprianov" <andrey.kouprianov@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I had a 5-6 times speed boost yesterday, after converting one of my
> design
> > docs to Erlang. Like a breath of fresh air, if you ask me.
> >
> >   Andrey
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Stanley Iriele <siriele2x3@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I'm curious... What exactly is the performance gain from writing
> > > views/shows/ etc in Erlang vs JavaScript... From what I've seen the
> > > JavaScript view server is sufficiently fast and feature complete.
> > >
> > > So my question is this.... Is the Erlang view server that much
> faster?...
> > > Is there another gain that I'm missing?..and is it as feature complete
> as
> > > the JavaScript equivalent?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Stanley
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message