Return-Path: 
 <user-return-24966-apmail-couchdb-user-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2401310BDC
	for <apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue, 16 Jul 2013 23:19:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 20881 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2013 23:19:39 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 20782 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2013 23:19:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.couchdb.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 20774 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2013 23:19:39 -0000
Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 23:19:39 +0000
Received: from localhost (HELO mail-ve0-f175.google.com) (127.0.0.1)
  (smtp-auth username rnewson, mechanism plain)
  by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP;
 Tue, 16 Jul 2013 23:19:39 +0000
Received: by mail-ve0-f175.google.com with SMTP id da11so969582veb.20
        for <user@couchdb.apache.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=o35Qr+bidRGqmxOD70Oj3prt3CA3arvvbBvypYnYRes=;
        b=hAnLEkahkEqVQsObkfC/X4/IQLPZpu8IuJTd1Y0c7lkwQzeEFCqBxWGShADvCs+VOP
         Fejy4kpo421Y6kafTTZJ+FF1HHpjEXHdsA6qV/wuYqpoR5eGfnuuSiaT2O8wdo/K+tCF
         EjT+mwsywEESRfo/JsDqwOp1Y5vhk44kwVZjWi90mCpwmnXhsjM5F/E2nHGOsiaR0z7W
         mY4ZEPkANtz8jx4Zcg3+QCv0zZGK9nvwkpfrSe77AUaBiaARv/6DnizN338+gDt0oVco
         rAIQKg9wb3ExcmA9sC++i8oXnmSlz7VmVXKOcSiM9G7f3RG1l1d8789R6T9ju4O/86Op
         Gyig==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.97.167 with SMTP id eb7mr1156779veb.45.1374016778535;
 Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.149.73 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPNuaCj1esJi-4+TX+dn_D8-vrLi3iGkWdM9qzaD1qYNC9324A@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+UPnOUTG-6puyw3kjGVdpm6=CUf2hHZ3+rUkj0N1Sq_BVB1Bw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABvT1DG0c9-Z2LgrPKmWMvLeMyn=9SzdtNeN7r2+Q_5aHgy5Zg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPNuaCj1esJi-4+TX+dn_D8-vrLi3iGkWdM9qzaD1qYNC9324A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:19:38 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CABvT1DEL-9Vmv6+vqDi8-9Vpm6JczATiew+n=3346PdfEMHOoA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: named reduce function
From: Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
To: "user@couchdb.apache.org" <user@couchdb.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

:)

On 17 July 2013 00:14, Stanley Iriele <siriele2x3@gmail.com> wrote:
> That sounds painful.... Thanks... I was just curious is all. Man Robert
> you're really on top of these user issues... Someone should send you a
> trophy of kind.... Maybe just a big red couch!
>
> On Jul 16, 2013 4:08 PM, "Robert Newson" <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Because reduce values are calculated at view build time, not query
>> time, so you're basically asking the view to precompute every possible
>> function's output.
>>
>> B.
>>
>>
>> On 17 July 2013 00:01, Stanley Iriele <siriele@breaktimestudios.com>
> wrote:
>> > just curious,
>> >
>> > How feasable is it for there to be named reduce functions
>> > and instead of reduce=true/false it could be reduce=<function name>
>> > and keep everything like group levels the same. and the default for no
>> > reduce being specified it could default to nothing ..like false. the
> only
>> > Illegal name for a reduce function could be 'map'.
>> >
>> > right now I am just returning an object much like what _stats
> generates. I
>> > was just curious why or why not this was a good sounding idea