Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of adam.kocoloski@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
Subject: Re: user Digest 7 Jun 2013 05:13:11 -0000 Issue 1365
From: Adam Kocoloski <kocolosk@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACLy94WLbHop0C=ujTjAbaptnS4O749NPiRWYyag3bLOnD2qyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:47:23 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D5AAF5E7-A3CB-4A06-A580-DD1ABF3C8C49@apache.org>
References: <1370581991.31832.ezmlm@couchdb.apache.org>
 <CAPExE9mukKzOOC9BVmd8EqUrjcKaBGNf0pVoW7MgoG-7bSv3=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACLy94WLbHop0C=ujTjAbaptnS4O749NPiRWYyag3bLOnD2qyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org

Consider yourself flattered ;-)

Adam

On Jun 8, 2013, at 2:44 AM, Jason Smith <jhs@apache.org> wrote:

> It was simply a playful jab at hosting companies which moved to a =
similar
> billing model.
>=20
>=20
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Zdravko Gligic <zgligic@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
>> "In fact, between you and me, before the Nodejitsu opportunity came =
along,
>> we were in the middle of revising the billing policy ourselves. Don't
>> worry, it was even better. Hey, we were doing "your log file is your
>> receipt" back before it was cool. We're over that now. :P"
>> -Jason Smith
>>=20
>> Please explain the above and especially "We're over that now." in =
terms of
>> whether it turned out to be better or worse than what you originally
>> thought and what conceptually did you come up that might be better?
>>=20
>> That model seems to favor big data - big docs folks and makes it =
relatively
>> expensive for community sites environments with huge number of =
"chatter
>> sized" message docs.  What do you think?
>>=20
>> In the meanwhile, congratulations and good luck in your new role.
>>=20
>> -Zdravko
>>=20