Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04559E404 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89706 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2013 17:41:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 89628 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2013 17:41:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 89619 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2013 17:41:03 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:41:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vb0-f45.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username rnewson, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:41:03 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id p1so1701966vbi.32 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:41:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.108.2 with SMTP id d2mr93676968vcp.60.1357926062005; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:41:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.68.209 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:41:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <50F04122.1060405@meetinghouse.net> <50F0464C.2030202@meetinghouse.net> <50F04D8E.1050207@meetinghouse.net> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:41:01 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: serious problems w/ new install From: Robert Newson To: "user@couchdb.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Those instructions date to when those packages were compatible, agree it should be updated now. On 11 January 2013 17:37, Octavian Damiean wrote: > Hello there, > > If that package doesn't exist you should build it yourself. > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Miles Fidelman > wrote: > >> Well that's kind of bothersome, in several regards: >> >> 1. the official install instructions are wrong >> >> the INSTALL.Unix file specifies libmozjs-dev >> >> as does >> http://wiki.apache.org/**couchdb/Installing_on_Debian >> which also calls for libmozjs2d >> >> neither calls for libmozjs185-dev >> >> 2. libmozjs185-dev is not available for Debian stable (Squeeze) - just for >> testing and sid >> >> Seems generally problematic. >> >> Any workarounds you can suggest? >> >> >> >> >> Robert Newson wrote: >> >>> Ah, that would be at least part of the problem, you need 1.8.5. >>> libmozjs185-dev, iirc. >>> >>> B. >>> >>> On 11 January 2013 17:05, Miles Fidelman >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Robert Newson wrote: >>>> >>>>> The install root defaults to /usr/local/ so installing config stuff to >>>>> /etc instead of /usr/local/etc would be non-standard (to say the >>>>> least). >>>>> >>>> >>>> Fair enough. >>>> >>>> >>>> What version of SpiderMonkey do you have installed? >>>>> >>>> >>>> The directions I followed were based on using mozjs, with directions to >>>> install libmozjs-dev libmozjs2d via apt, and to configure w/ >>>> >>>> ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-js-lib=/usr/lib >>>> --with-js-include=/usr/**include/mozjs --enable-init >>>> >>>> looks like version 1.9.1.16-20 of both packages (the current one from the >>>> Debian Squeeze repo.) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> B. >>>>> >>>>> On 11 January 2013 16:43, Miles Fidelman >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> HELP! >>>>>> >>>>>> Just installed CouchDB 1.2.1 under Debian (Squeeze, amd64), using the >>>>>> instructions at >>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/**couchdb/Installing_on_Debian >>>>>> >>>>>> Notice a few things during the install: >>>>>> - make test ran all but one test successfully - 220-compaction-daemon.t >>>>>> Failed >>>>>> - make did NOT install the startup script in /etc/init.d/ - had to copy >>>>>> it >>>>>> in manually >>>>>> - it seems sort of odd for Couch to install config stuff under >>>>>> /usr/local/etc, rather than /etc (non-standard to say the least) >>>>>> - everything starts up fine >>>>>> - verify installation tells me everything is fine >>>>>> >>>>>> but.... >>>>>> - when I run the test suites, 39 of 62 fail! >>>>>> - I'd love to share the test report, or a link to it (I told Futon to >>>>>> share >>>>>> it), but... >>>>>> --- any suggestions on how either extract the local copy in a form that >>>>>> can >>>>>> be attached to an email, or, >>>>>> --- how to identify the report in the 7000 or so in the shared test >>>>>> report >>>>>> database? >>>>>> >>>>>> First question: any simple way to extract the test report as a >>>>>> document I >>>>>> can attach to an email >>>>>> >>>>>> HELP!!! >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Miles Fidelman >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. >>>>>> In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> -- >>>> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. >>>> In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra >>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. >> In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra >> >>