Well that's kind of bothersome, in several regards: 1. the official install instructions are wrong the INSTALL.Unix file specifies libmozjs-dev as does http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Installing_on_Debian which also calls for libmozjs2d neither calls for libmozjs185-dev 2. libmozjs185-dev is not available for Debian stable (Squeeze) - just for testing and sid Seems generally problematic. Any workarounds you can suggest? Robert Newson wrote: > Ah, that would be at least part of the problem, you need 1.8.5. > libmozjs185-dev, iirc. > > B. > > On 11 January 2013 17:05, Miles Fidelman wrote: >> Robert Newson wrote: >>> The install root defaults to /usr/local/ so installing config stuff to >>> /etc instead of /usr/local/etc would be non-standard (to say the >>> least). >> >> Fair enough. >> >> >>> What version of SpiderMonkey do you have installed? >> >> The directions I followed were based on using mozjs, with directions to >> install libmozjs-dev libmozjs2d via apt, and to configure w/ >> >> ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-js-lib=/usr/lib >> --with-js-include=/usr/include/mozjs --enable-init >> >> looks like version 1.9.1.16-20 of both packages (the current one from the >> Debian Squeeze repo.) >> >> >> >>> B. >>> >>> On 11 January 2013 16:43, Miles Fidelman >>> wrote: >>>> Hi Folks, >>>> >>>> HELP! >>>> >>>> Just installed CouchDB 1.2.1 under Debian (Squeeze, amd64), using the >>>> instructions at >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Installing_on_Debian >>>> >>>> Notice a few things during the install: >>>> - make test ran all but one test successfully - 220-compaction-daemon.t >>>> Failed >>>> - make did NOT install the startup script in /etc/init.d/ - had to copy >>>> it >>>> in manually >>>> - it seems sort of odd for Couch to install config stuff under >>>> /usr/local/etc, rather than /etc (non-standard to say the least) >>>> - everything starts up fine >>>> - verify installation tells me everything is fine >>>> >>>> but.... >>>> - when I run the test suites, 39 of 62 fail! >>>> - I'd love to share the test report, or a link to it (I told Futon to >>>> share >>>> it), but... >>>> --- any suggestions on how either extract the local copy in a form that >>>> can >>>> be attached to an email, or, >>>> --- how to identify the report in the 7000 or so in the shared test >>>> report >>>> database? >>>> >>>> First question: any simple way to extract the test report as a document I >>>> can attach to an email >>>> >>>> HELP!!! >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Miles Fidelman >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. >>>> In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra >>>> >> >> -- >> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. >> In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra >> -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra